BA worker wins landmark ruling
A British Airways worker who was forced out of her job for wearing a cross had her religious rights violated, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled.
In a landmark legal ruling, Nadia Eweida's case was upheld by judges in Strasbourg who ruled the decision to express her faith warranted protection under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The 60-year-old was sent home from work for displaying a small silver crucifix during her job as an airport check-in attendant for the airline.
Yesterday, the ECHR ruled Miss Eweida, a Coptic Christian, had been discriminated against under freedom of religion laws.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.ukView details
Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013
However, they rejected similar claims made by three other Christians, including a challenge brought by nurse Shirley Chaplin, 57, who was switched to a desk job after she refused to take off a crucifix which hung round her neck.
Mrs Chaplin's claims were rejected on the grounds the removal of her necklace was necessary to protect the health and safety of nurses and patients.
Another two cases – those of marriage counsellor Gary McFarlane, 51, and registrar Lillian Ladele, 52, who objected to elements of their jobs which they felt conflicted with their beliefs – were also dismissed.
In relation to Ms Eweida, the ruling stated her cross was "discreet and cannot have detracted from her professional appearance".
It went on: "There was no evidence the wearing of other, previously authorised, items of religious clothing, such as turbans and hijabs, by other employees had any negative impact on British Airways' brand or image.
"Moreover, the fact the company was able to amend the uniform code to allow for the visible wearing of religious symbolic jewellery demonstrates the earlier prohibition was not of crucial importance.
"The court therefore concludes the domestic authorities failed sufficiently to protect the first applicant's right to manifest her religion."
Miss Eweida spoke of her delight following the ECHR's decision and said Christian rights had been "vindicated" in relation to her own case.
But she said: "I'm disappointed on behalf of the other three applicants."
Miss Eweida, from Twickenham, was awarded £1,600 in damages and £25,000 to cover costs.