“I agree with Oscar Wilde on this one, hunting is "the unspeakable in pursuit of the uneatable"; but I am sick and tired of the so-called moral majority telling the rest of us that anyone who disagrees with them "needs stringing-up". Let the politicians make the decision, after all it was a manifesto commitment by the Conservatives to have a free vote and they did get more votes than each of the other parties.”

“Ah, the January equivalent of April fool ....

and guess who fell for it!”

“A Blackshaw is a sick individual for wanting politicians to be executed if they make decisions he/she disagrees with.”

“Apaert from being a ridiculous, reactionary letter, it doesn't make sense. I presume that the first line should read "displeasure" and not "pleaseure".

Does the writer not realise that hunts no longer chase foxes with hounds, but follow trails laid earlier?

The ban is here to stay and I could not care less either way. I have given my reasons previously and do not intend to go over them again today, but the likes of A Blackshaw would make more sense and gather more support if they moderated their language.”

“Have to agree David (though profoundly against hunting with dogs). There are enough real moral issues to debate rationally over this issue without silly comments like this”

“Well, we're all entitled to our own opinion but I wouldn't stoop so low as to say all the antis need "stringing up". Now that would be barbaric!!

So often the antis rant, get all heated up and in the end lose the argument.”