Calls to curb G4S contracts
Police representatives in Leicestershire have called on the Government to block embattled Olympic security firm G4S from any further major contracts.
The firm has been in the firing line all week since it emerged thousands of military personnel were being brought in to work on the Games' security effort because G4S had failed to recruit and train enough guards.
Leicestershire Police Federation and Unison yesterday echoed Labour leader Ed Miliband in calling on the Government to halt plans to hand any further contracts – including police work – to G4S.
Sections of "back office" civilian posts at Lincolnshire Police were transferred to G4S earlier this year in a 10-year, £200 million deal.
in our summer room we have loads of
sale items alot with at least 75% off
£10 rail too.
shoes and hats reduced too.
tops trousers and skirts from 20% to 50%off
Contact: 0116 3667004
Valid until: Saturday, June 29 2013
Leicestershire Police and another 40 forces signed an agreement which meant they would also choose G4S – whose chief executive Nick Buckles this week gave evidence on Olympic security staffing to the Home Affairs Select Committee – if they decided to go down the same route.
The county's force is not, at present, planning to privatise any of its civilian services.
Leicestershire Police Federation chairman Ivan Stafford said the federation had repeatedly warned policing services were "far too important for it to be put into the hands of private, profit-driven companies".
He said: "We would join the Labour leader in calling for the Government to rethink its plans to outsource more police services.
"We want ministers to put a stop to G4S – or any other private companies – being given any more contracts until a full investigation of the Olympics security fiasco has been carried out."
Chris Hanrahan, secretary of Unison's police branch, which represents civilian staff, said: "Chief constables have not given good account as to the rationale for outsourcing."
Leicestershire Police finance director Paul Dawkins said the force had not been placed under any obligation to bring G4S in.
However, he said signing up to the Lincolnshire Police deal meant his force would save money and time on the tendering process should the force decide to privatise some of its services.
A Home Office spokesman said: "The police will remain a public service, accountable to the people, and any decisions on further business partnering will be taken by elected police and crime commissioners, giving local people a say."
G4S said yesterday it was "making good progress" on the number of security staff for the Olympics.
A spokesman said: "We are working very closely with (Olympic organising committee) LOCOG, the military, police and Government and we expect to continue to build on the progress we have made in the past few days."






Comments
by Benwho21
Saturday, July 21 2012, 3:17PM
“I would far rather the government spend my taxes on the police, army, navy, airforce etc than G4S.”
by leicestergel
Saturday, July 21 2012, 2:06PM
“Deputy clown palmer is pulling money out of Barclays.How many contracts does this clowncil have with group s***?”
by Pulltogether
Saturday, July 21 2012, 2:03PM
“It is the 1st responsiblty of any government to protect its citizens END OFF”
by leicestergel
Saturday, July 21 2012, 1:50PM
“Come on Mercury,have one of your polls.The one about the mayor was good and reflective.Lets have another simple one.....real cops or group s***?”
by Carmedic
Saturday, July 21 2012, 1:19PM
“by CGLee...."I don't think it very likely that G4S will be getting government contracts anu time soon!"
Wouldn't be so sure on that CGLee. Don't be surprised if a palm somewhere doesn't get well greased and before you know it G4S will be orchestrating another gigantic cock-up and it'll be too late to do anything about it.”
by Newarkfox
Saturday, July 21 2012, 9:37AM
“last year a huge amount of troops across all 3 services were made redundant, how prudent would it have been to hold off for a year? I bet the costs in wages and compensation would be less than what the current debacle is costing now.”
by CGLee
Saturday, July 21 2012, 9:19AM
“I don't think it very likely that G4S will be getting government contracts anu time soon!”
by leicestergel
Saturday, July 21 2012, 8:16AM
“What do we want?G+++T or real security?Cops should be first line always.G+++t cannot account for uniforms sent out,let alone make a place secure with !6 year old "trainees".”