BREAKING NEWS
 

Council criticised for hiring private venue

Trusted article source icon
Friday, October 26, 2012
Profile image for Leicester Mercury

Leicester Mercury

Unions have criticised the city council for spending thousands of pounds hiring conference facilities at the Leicester Tigers ground.

The council used the facilities to stage a transport strategy meeting for more than 400 people in April.

The Leicester and Districts Trade Unions Council, which was not among the 50-plus transport groups and organisations invited to attend, said the authority should have used one of its leisure centres rather than a private corporate venue.

It submitted a Freedom of Information request which revealed the five-hour event cost more than £2,200 – including tea, coffee, biscuits and sandwiches at £765.

****Best Deals**** Van Insurance for 17-24 Yr Old Drivers -...

Insure365

View details

Print voucher

****Best Deals**** Van Insurance for 17-24 Yr Old Drivers - Contact Insure365 on 01782 898188

Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer

Contact: 01782 898188

Valid until: Friday, July 19 2013

Union spokesman Paul Southwood said: "At a time when the council is cutting services and making staff redundant, it is not right they should be spending so much money on venues.

"They could have used the Aylestone leisure centre, just up the road, and saved a lot of cash."

The council said it chose the ground because of its relatively central location for most of the delegates and because of its good disabled access, as well as its size and the availability of side rooms for workshops.

Deputy city mayor responsible for transport Councillor Rory Palmer said: "The main thing was the size of the event. The town hall or the council offices could not have held it.

"Perhaps we could have used a leisure centre but they are not so central and they are used for sport during the day.

"There will always be a cost to staging an event like this but it was not lavish or over the top."

Conservative city councillor Ross Grant criticised the union for its stance.

He said: "The alternative suggested by the union, which is a large sports hall, is not suitable. It's use would have been very disruptive to people trying to use the leisure centre for the purpose it is designed for."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for Banksider33

    by Banksider33

    Friday, October 26 2012, 6:01PM

    “Sounds like sour grapes to me, especially as the local TUC weren't invited for tea and cakes.

    It's time union reps were more in touch with reality and people, rather than spend time whinging. If 400 delegates were attending, and 50% came by car, then parking around the leisure centre would have been 'interesting' to say the least.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article