Cuts 'could kill' voluntary sector
The voluntary sector is in danger of collapsing because of a lack of cash, groups have warned the city council.
A dozen organisations – which between them help thousands of people – have written to Leicester City Council, saying groups could fold if the authority makes further cuts to their grants.
Voluntary sector leaders want the council to rethink the way it funds them.
Bosses at the Leicester Action for Mental Health Project, the YMCA, Network for Change, b-inspired, New Dawn New Day, Vista, Leicester Day Trust, Stride, Lighthouse and the city's Aids Support Service put their names to the letter.
Cheap Van Insurance For 17,18 & 19 Year Old Drivers - Call Insure365 01782 898188, Free Legal Expenses Cover Included Valued at £25.00!
Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer
Contact: 01782 898188
Valid until: Saturday, June 22 2013
Voluntary Action Leicestershire (VAL) also signed the letter to Councillor Michael Cooke, who chairs the council's health and community scrutiny committee.
It said it wanted a review "in light of the real concerns that the city's voluntary and community sector is in danger of collapsing/imploding in the current financial climate".
Kevin Allen-Khimani, VAL's policy and partnership leader, said: "We know the city council is having its own budgets reduced by a Government that has chosen a programme of austerity but we do want to be part of the discussion on how the cuts happen.
"Some groups are teetering on the edge, having already cut their own costs to try to weather the storm."
Mr Allen-Khimani said there were 372 voluntary groups in the city, employing 1,600 people. He said: "I don't envy the city mayor and his executive because he has some very tough decisions."
The voluntary groups want the council to rethink its tendering process, which they said often favoured larger, private firms over more specialised local groups.
The council is looking to make at least £8.4 million of cuts to services.
Coun Cooke, whose scrutiny group will discuss the issue on Tuesday, was unavailable for comment.
Sir Peter said: "I welcome the scrutiny review into this and I wish I had not been put in a position by the Government where such harsh cuts are needed.
"Leicester historically has a proud record of support for the voluntary and community groups and historically has the highest level of funding of any large city."




Comments
by sansue
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 10:53PM
“"I chose to spend my own money to go to the conference "
Yet you yourself called it a "jolly" and said "there is nothing at this conference that can't be picked up from the web or read about in the latest edition of Local Government chronicle"?! You'll excuse me if I say that something doesn't quite add up here!”
by Bomberbabe
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 10:33PM
“I work in a volunteer capacity on a number of community programmes and receive no money for doing so , most of that work is with vulnerable children and their families . I chose to spend my own money to go to the conference . So you are correct NO taxpayers money was used and no one paid for my place .not that this is really any of your business or indeed relevant to this article.”
by sansue
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 10:26PM
“Bomberbabe, so NO taxpayers money was used to pay for your place at the conference (e.g. you don't, for example, work for a VCS organisation who paid for your place)?”
by sansue
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 10:26PM
“Bomberbabe, so NO taxpayers money was used to pay for your place at the conference (e.g. you don't, for example, work for a VCS organisation who paid for your place)?”
by Bomberbabe
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 9:10PM
“Sansue, who I work for has nothing to do with you or indeed this article . Unlike councillor Dempster I'm not accountable to you or the taxpayers of leicester , but she is .. We pay her wages . My posts related to CHOICE , I cannot for the life of me fathom why when this council is cutting back on the voluntary sector , when her own department ( and yes I know the government has cut grants ) is facing 11 million worth of cuts , she chooses to go to the seaside . This money would have been better spent on supporting the most needy in this city . All over leicester families are having to make hard choices in the face of hard times and you seek to justify a councillor using some of those needed resources to go to the seaside ! Please ......”
by Bob491
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 8:18PM
“garyb, why are you always accusing others of your own shortcomings?”
by garyb2011
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 8:16PM
“Bob
Copy/paste again I see - predictable as ever (albeit it is someone else's post this time).
Blah blah Con blah Con over wealthy blah blah
Yawn”
by sansue
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 8:14PM
“"Instead to accuse me of being 'extreme right wing' citing previous posts that are still visible.So sansue, give me examples of these posts"
Well, the one that actually shocked me the most (even for you) was this recent sweeping generalisation about people from the Philipines who have settled here:
"So, whilst I am sure that these people are lovely and hard-working and lots of other very nice things they should not be here"
Are you actually denying that you have very strong right wing views? At least have the strength of your convictions for goodness sake.”
by sansue
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 8:10PM
“"The difference being of course I used my money to attend not the taxpayers of leicester"
Oh my god, this is getting laughable. And I take it you DON'T work in the VCS?”
by garyb2011
Tuesday, October 30 2012, 8:06PM
“Ah sansue - at last some honesty albeit hidden in your lazy responses.
So, Bomberbabe raises some serious questions about the value of Vi (£30K) Dempster spending at several thousand pounds at a public sector talking shop. Bomberbabe questioned many things but you chose to ignore these valid questions - your focus was whether this conference was solely 'Child' focused or 'Adult & Child' focused. Apparently you proved how misinformed he was but chose to ignore his other points.
Instead to accuse me of being 'extreme right wing' citing previous posts that are still visible.So sansue, give me examples of these posts (plural) if they are so accessible and prove how so very clever you are. Perhaps you could also answer the other criticisms raised by Bomberbabe while you are at it?
And then we find that you used to (I guess that means that you do not do so now) 'lobby at Westminster' - seemingly with limited success. So we can all now understand that we are hardly likely to hear any objective criticism of Vi's actions are we?
Accuse me of whatever you like but at least prove it. Also you could also apologise to Bomberbabe who is clearly much better informed than you - or his he/she extreme right wing because they do not buy what Vi and you are peddling?”