Debate over Simon de Montfort statue
For many, Simon de Montfort is an icon, rightly celebrated in our street names, buildings and monuments.
To others, he is an anti-Semite, who should be remembered for his order to expel Jewish people from Leicester.
-

Statue of Simon de Montfort at county hall
The debate has now erupted into a row about whether a statue of the medieval powerbroker should be kept on show by Leicestershire County Council.
A member of staff has written asking councillors to justify having a work of art depicting him in the main foyer of the council offices, in Glenfield.
The statue that greets visitors was commissioned in the 1960s and was made because de Montfort is an important figure in the history of Leicester and England.
The former Earl of Leicester is credited with calling England's first directly elected parliament, and as a father of British democracy.
However, the member of staff, who wished to remain anonymous, said: "Could we not have a more appropriate figure adorning the foyer of County Hall than Simon de Montfort?
"Despite his obvious achievements in other fields, this man was a noted anti-Semite who rid the city of Leicester of its Jewish community.
"Is this really someone who should be represented here?
"Is this really a welcoming image to any Jewish visitor or member of staff at Leicestershire County Council?"
De Montfort's influence is reflected in numerous buildings throughout the city, not least in the name of Leicester's main concert hall and a university.
However, he is also remembered for an edict of 1231 which banished Jews from the city – some 20 years before a general expulsion across the country.
As a result of his actions, there was no Jewish community in the city until the middle of the 19th century.
De Montfort's charter asked landlords to turn away Jewish people, and said: "No Jew or Jewess in my time, or in the time of any of my heirs to the end of the world, shall inhabit or remain or obtain a residence in Leicester."
A spokeswoman for the county council said the earl's life was tied to Leicestershire's history, even though some of his behaviour was seen as unacceptable now.
She said the statue would be staying.
She said: "I do not suppose that he is unique in the context of historical figures with flawed personalities whose personal conduct and attitudes would not be tolerated by today's society.
"The arms of the county of Leicestershire incorporate the arms of three former Earls of Leicester, including Simon de Montfort and his white lion."
She said the statue was as much a tribute to its sculptor, Sean Compton, who was given the Military Cross for bravery in the Second World War, after he took the blast of a mine to save his comrades.
In 2001, a group of Christian campaigners called on the city council to renounce the charter issued by de Montfort in 1231.
There were also protests against the fact that he was depicted on the city's Clock Tower.
University of Leicester historian Professor Aubrey Newman said: "He was a bad man but that was not at all uncommon in the 13th century.
"I think it would be a nonsense to get rid of the statue at County Hall."







26 Comments
View all
by Jon, leics
Thursday, September 18 2008, 1:58PM
“Leave it well alone - attempts to alter the past are steps on the way to total censorship - we should be encouraging debate on these issues and learning from the past, not hiding it and pretending it never happened.”
by katrina b, beaumont leys
Thursday, September 18 2008, 12:23PM
“well if you get rid of the statue then why not go the whole hog and change the name of the uni that name after him”
by jon, leicester
Thursday, September 18 2008, 12:12PM
“Nobody's perfect. Ghandi himself was a racist; he lived in South Africa as a young man and his attitude towards blacks was indistinguishable from the whites at the time. History is often a bit more complicated than people think...”
by DMU student, Leicester
Thursday, September 18 2008, 12:08PM
“Simon De Monfort is someone Leicester can be proud to be associated with, why cange things for pc madness think of the money it would cost. we are in a credit crunch yet some leftie loons want to change things for no reral reason. I attend the DMU and i am proud of the name leave it be. Jews were expelled from this country in our past where it may not seem right today it was then things change but you cant change the past.”
by David Hankey, Great Easton, Leics.
Thursday, September 18 2008, 10:49AM
“Simon De Montfort has been associated with the City of Leicester for centuries which can't be said of Gandhi.
Remove De Montfort then change also the name of the University, roads and any other connection - quite ludicrous!!”
by Daniel, Leicester
Thursday, September 18 2008, 10:42AM
“We could have a statue of Gary Lineaker! or John Merrick! surely they cant offend anyone. hmmm”
by Tim Howard, Knighton
Thursday, September 18 2008, 9:56AM
“I know-why not have a statue of Ariel Sharon?”
by Iain, Stoney Stanton
Thursday, September 18 2008, 8:35AM
“Another case of the spineless demanding changes without being accountable.
Do we get rid of all the portraits of past kings and queens who made this country GREAT Britain by questionable means ????
I bet the person at County Hall works "flexi time" and has a nice pension coming up ! ! !!
GET A LIFE AND WORRY ABOUT REAL ISSUES ! ! ! !”
by Mohammed, Leicester
Wednesday, September 17 2008, 1:06PM
“I¿m disappointed with two aspects of this story: Firstly, the Mercury itself. What is the purpose of publishing such a story? Heritage is important, but why make it an issue? We should be celebrating tolerance, peace, prosperity and harmony in the city, not trying to break it. Secondly, I am disappointed with the language used in the comments made by readers. I have always been taught ¿one planet, one environment, one human race¿. Clearly many people have yet to learn and implement this lesson. Perhaps history is repeating itself!”
by John Ryde, Newbold Verdon
Wednesday, September 17 2008, 12:49PM
“The mental rapists (pc brigade) want to make history a thing of the past.”