'Admit you are beaten over eco-town'

Trusted article source icon
Friday, July 17, 2009
Profile image for This is Leicestershire

This is Leicestershire

Campaigners in Leicestershire today challenged the Co-op to "admit they were beaten" after the Government threw out proposals for Pennbury.

Not only did Co-op Estates' proposed 15,000-home development not make the shortlist for Britain's first environmentally-friendly towns, announced yesterday, it failed to make a "second wave" of projects assessed as needing more work before being considered again.

That means its only chance would be by winning the backing of local authorities – which have been among the plan's fiercest critics.

Dr Kevin Feltham, chairman of Campaign Against the Co-op Eco Town (Cascet), said: "This is a great victory for us and our campaign. Our aim is now to get the Co-op to withdraw from the eco-town process completely. It should admit when it is beaten."

Pennbury was proposed for land between Stoughton, Great Glen and Oadby more than two years ago.

At the time, eco-towns were a flagship Government programme to tackle climate change and meet housing needs, but Pennbury – to be built on acres of fields – was controversial from the start.

Villagers and residents of neighbouring towns organised demonstrations, campaigns, rallies and public debates.

The Co-op proposed schools, affordable housing, workplaces, health centres, allotments, community orchards, shops, post offices and green spaces.

But yesterday the Department for Communities and Local Government said it did not believe Pennbury's location was "currently possessing potential for an eco-town".

Its final appraisal found there were too many doubts about whether the road network could cope, the proposed transport infrastructure and problems attracting employers to the area – the main criticisms made by Leicestershire County Council.

Its key conclusions were:

It would cause congestion as the road network was not able to cope with the extra traffic.

It was unclear how it would deliver its pledge of providing jobs in the eco-town for people who lived there.

The eco-town posed a threat to regeneration in Leicester by drawing money away from the city.

There were fears about potential increased flood risks.

Oadby and Wigston borough and Leicestershire county councils objected to the plan and Harborough District Council raised concerns. The only authority to support the proposal was Leicester City Council after Co-op Estates said a tram into the city was a key feature.

Yesterday, campaigners and MPs highlighted the opposition by handing in a 15,000-name petition at 10 Downing Street.

Harborough MP Edward Garnier said: "This is a great day and the culmination of two-and-a-half years of hard work for many people. But we must guard against complacency because I am in no doubt Co-op will use its vast resources to try again. It is the third time it has tried to build here. I believe it will try a fourth."

Leicester East MP Keith Vaz and Leicester South MP Sir Peter Soulsby were also at Downing Street. Mr Vaz said: "This is a victory for the people and a victory for common sense. So many people opposed the eco-town that to implement it would have been extremely ill-advised."

Sir Peter said: "I am ecstatic. But the city council should not have backed it. It would have damaged the city in terms of transport and regeneration, but it was seduced by the tram."

Rutland and Melton MP Alan Duncan said: "I congratulate all the campaigners who have been fighting hard for this result and particularly the work of Cascet."

Graham Stocks, of the Campaign to Protect Rural England, said: 'We accept this decision with guarded caution, though we are naturally very pleased that a large extent of east Leicestershire's beautiful and agriculturally productive landscape is no longer under immediate threat of rampant development."

Councillor John Boyce, leader of Oadby and Wigston Borough Council, said: "The announcement shows that common sense has prevailed."

Ross Willmott, leader of Leicester City Council, was disappointed, but said that building on the land was bound to happen eventually.

He said: "I'm not surprised by the announcement, given the scale of the undertaking. It's going to happen one day because of the overwhelming need for it."

The successful eco-town sites were Whitehill-Bordon in Hampshire, St Austell in Cornwall, Rackheath in Norfolk and North West Bicester in Oxfordshire.

Eco-town chief civil servant Henry Cleary told the Leicester Mercury that these had been pursued because of their high green standards and council backing.

Ruaridh Jackson, Co-op Estates' head of planning, said it would continue to work on its plans.

21
Tweet this article
Report

21 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by David Hankey, Great Easton, Leics.

    Friday, July 17 2009, 2:55PM

    “The Co-op have been well and truly beaten over their crazy idealogical proposal to plant a new town the size of Hinckley on the doorstep of Leicester.

    Their Head of Planning, Ruaridh Jackson states "this is what we were expecting", what absolute poppycock.

    Anyone with an ounce of commonsense knew this plan was doomed from the start. It was absolutely absurd to think that a development of this monumental size could ever pass the test laid down.

    Best advice is, stop wasting your money and those of your members and put this proposal in the rubbish bin without further ado.

    I know it's a bitter pill to swallow but your whole idea was fanciful in the extreme and never likely to see the light of day!!”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by Alan, Leics

    Friday, July 17 2009, 2:53PM

    “For Michaels information the Charity farm was formed quite a few years before the Stretton Magna plan.”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by Keith, Leicestershire

    Friday, July 17 2009, 1:47PM

    “Mr Goodyer, the Co-op has no interest in our communities at all. The Stoughton Farm Estate is run as a huge agro-business from Manchester : nothing wrong with that but do not pretend the Co-op is a paternalistic organisation when it is not. It is a huge capitalist for-profit economic enterprise : absolutely fine as long as it is recognised for what it is. The days when it joined in with the local community are sadly long gone. It also has a disgraceful record as landlord : just what you would expect from an absentee landlord that cares not a jot about local people and just wants to destroy communities in pursuit of financial gain. The Pennbury debacle has at least shown the Co-op in its true colours. The damage to its reputation will take a lot of repairing.”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by eric goodyer, unity house

    Friday, July 17 2009, 1:45PM

    “We received £50 from the Midland Co-Op last year. We have never received anything from the Co-Op nationally or from Co-Op Estates. I do not need cash incentives to recognise the importance of working with the private sector to create jobs, houses and employment. The key issue is that they must meet local need and follow the local planning planning process. I am more than willing to work with anyone including Ruraidh Jackson to deliver what the community needs and wants. I have also never hesitated to oppose developers who step outside of these boundaries, as is proven by my record of opposing the development of Dishley Grange and the Thurmaston SUE”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by sandra, cardiff

    Friday, July 17 2009, 1:42PM

    “Reading the comments over the past few months has been riverting - baiscally its down the NIBYs- but of course cause it did not affect the the high flyers in Oadby Wigston it was ok to spoil the countryside in Barrow with 400 houses and now another prosposed 300 houses - and how did Barrow Council react to that!!! - Also what happened about the so called consultation process where we were promised there would be no 3 story houses - simple when you have planning permission, just put in a revision.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters