Eco-town inspired by Paris and Barcelona
Architecture found in Paris, Barcelona and London has been used by developers as inspiration for their vision of an eco-town.
The Leicester Mercury can exclusively reveal new artist's impressions showing what Pennbury would look like if it is built.
Co-op Estates has produced watercolour paintings showing the 15,000 home town's proposed central square, a typical residential street and part of the town's Great Park close to the north of the town towards Leicester.
The three show what urban, semi-urban and more rural areas would look like at the proposed site between Stoughton and Great Glen.
These impressions have been put together using the Co-op Estates' 128-page dossier on the town as a blueprint, which was sent to Government to explain what it would be like to live there. The first image shows Pennbury's giant town square, which will have allotments, children's play areas, with bars, restaurants and homes.
At its heart would be a triangle of land, similar in size to Leicester's Victoria Park, which would have room for an orchard, markets and open-air concerts.
Ruairidh Jackson, head of planning and property strategy for the Co-op, said: "The idea with the town's square is that it should be like a miniature version of the Great Park, with allotments, orchards and play space.The buildings around the side show how we want to create something modern and different. These buildings are similar to architecture found in Paris or Barcelona.
"Running around it are our community buses, which would ferry residents into the town's centre."
The second image shows a typical street in the city, with family homes on one side, and with flats and restaurants on the other. It also shows a world with fewer cars as two homes would have one parking space between them, allowing cyclists and public transport more freedom.
Mr Jackson said: "This area is meant to have a similar feel to areas found around Russell Square, in London, with a slightly lower density mix of housing compared with the town centre. This image is designed to show what a typical street would look like."
The last image is of a tree nursery, to the north of Pennbury, close to a man-made lake with sporting facilities, sports pitches and larger semi-detached homes.
"This shows the mix of open spaces we are planning, and how the town would flow softly outwards to a lower density of houses." he said.
Chairman of anti-Pennbury group Cascet Councillor Kevin Feltham, said: "If the street scene is the likely scenario, then all the careful transport modelling that has taken place to date is worthless, and there will be massive congestion on surrounding roads such as the A6 and A47 with thousands of extra cars every day.
"If the Co-op is going to commission and use visualisations, it must portray the reality of its Masterplan Vision – massive blocks of tall apartment blocks will be evident."
Fellow county councillor for the area Simon Galton: "The Co-op are trying to create an urban landscape in a rural environment. It does not fit with its surroundings.
"I think these images are quite misleading. In the town centre the density of housing they have talked about would be up to six storeys high, where is this?"
Last month, a report by independent consultancy Halcrow said it had "serious reservations" about the proposals. Plans are out to public consultation until March 6, when the four local authorities will deliver their conclusions.
More than a third of the electorate in a village have voted against the eco-town plans. A total of 99 per cent of nearly 1,000 villagers from Great Glen rejected the Co-op's proposals in a referendum last night.
In a five-hour period yesterday afternoon, 971 people voted in the poll, organised by Great Glen Parish Council.
A total of 964 of those said no to the development, which is planned for land between Leicester and Great Glen.
Three people voted yes and there were four spoilt ballot papers.
County councillor Kevin Feltham, chairman of Campaign Against the Stoughton Co-op Eco Town (CASCET), said: "This poll is a real indicator of local opinion, and will, I am sure, be helpful to the Harborough District and Leicestershire county councillors when they decide on their response to the Co-op and Government consultations."













41 Comments
View all
by Paul, Hamilton
Friday, January 16 2009, 2:09PM
“Jay- If you already have a house in Leicester and work in Leicester why move to Pennbury- one you are taking up a house somebody else could use and if you work in Leicester you are going to use up more C02 going to and from work. Surely both against your principles why you are in favour of Pennbury!!
Mr LFE the reason why the Co-op want Pennbury is that they are going to make a massive amount of cash from a piece of land they own which they would normally not be allowed to build on. There are many other places where these houses and flats could be built- it is just the Co-op does not own this land.”
by Paul, Hamilton
Friday, January 16 2009, 2:08PM
“If you already have a house in Leicester and work in Leicester why move to Pennbury- one you are taking up a house somebody else could use and if you work in Leicester you are going to use up more C02 going to and from work. Surely both against your principles why you are in favour of Pennbury!!
Mr LFE the reason why the Co-op want Pennbury is that they are going to make a massive amount of cash from a piece of land they own which they would normally not be allowed to build on. There are many other places where these houses and flats could be built- it is just the Co-op does not own this land.”
by Daniel, Leicester
Friday, January 16 2009, 12:46PM
“As per normal Jay, Leicester you appear to be on the losing team! this eco town will never happen and I only hope they stop wasting more money trying to push it through! It makes no financial sense or common sense. Jay if you want to buy a nice eco home there are many around england already built, help yourself as there all still to expensive and vacant!!”
by Jay, Leicester
Friday, January 16 2009, 12:39PM
“I can't wait to move into the Harborough constituency, Pennbury - it looks so nice!
The locals are just being selfish, and if anyone has a different opinion to them, obviously they must be wrong. Just because they have a nice house and a nice part of the city and don't want more traffic/people around them. Soon we'll be your neighbours. Even if the justification for Pennbury isn't sound - it's happening, deal with it people.”
by K Clark, Fleckney
Friday, January 16 2009, 9:34AM
“Oh dear!
The only thing that stopped me laughing at these dreadful artist impressions is the ongoing 'debate' between the semi-anonymous Mr Nimby - or whatever his name is - and everyone else.
A number of points, if I may, Mr Nimby:
1] I can't see much work going on in those pictures, which probably sets Pennbury apart from the likes of Great Glen. The villagers' employers have probably had a say in when they can vote. They probably don't have the time to post multiple entries on threads like this, picking people up in the style of Microsoft Spelling & Grammar Check.
2] Does the turnout at a general election determine who is to be voted into office? If that is the case then no-one would ever be elected. I would suggest that a 30% turnout for a village referendum, where the polls are open for less than half the time, holds up well against an equivalent general election and certainly against local elections.
3] Despite the fact that only 3 from 964 are in favour of Pennbury, you grasp at those three straws as though they are indicative of local demand. The only people in favour of the eco-town other than the Glorious 3 are the Co-op, LCC, Muhammed Aziz Khan and you, none of whom live in the Harborough constituency and therefore it is none of their collective business.
4] Following on from my previous point, you seem to be applying the logic that it is not the number of people who are voting that is important, rather how often they turn up and shout. Do you get this idea from the number of times you have contributed to this thread, which you are losing about 18-2 so far?
5] Any response longer than a Labour Party soundbite is usually met with a derisory remark, which does you no credit whatsoever.”