Kray Twins mediator, 77, refused to eat and starved himself to death in prison
An armed robber starved himself to death in prison during a protest against his conviction more than 20 years earlier, an inquest heard.
Ronnie Easterbrook, who acted as a mediator between the Kray twins, was just 6st 3lb when he died at Gartree Prison, near Market Harborough, following a six-month hunger strike.
-

Gartree Prison, near Market Harborough
The 77-year-old was jailed for life in 1988 for shooting a police officer during an armed robbery at a supermarket in Woolwich, south-east London.
At an inquest yesterday at Leicester Town Hall, a jury found Easterbrook died from pneumonia brought on by his refusal to eat food, adding “he took his own life as a result of deliberate self-starvation’’.
Home Office pathologist Dr Amanda Jeffery told the hearing that Easterbrook, from London’s East End, died on May 10 last year.
She said: “Mr Easterbrook felt he had been unjustly treated by the system and he was refusing food as a protest. He understood the consequences of not eating but he did not want life-sustaining measures.”
The inquest heard Easterbrook, who had arrived at Gartree in 1988, was admitted to the prison medical centre in March last year and told staff not to resuscitate him.
It was his third hunger strike while at Gartree.
Katherine Wharton, a nurse at the prison, told the hearing: “He had obviously lost a significant amount of weight (by March 2009) but he could get himself out of bed and into a chair while his bedding was changed. He tired very easily and he spent almost all of his day resting in his bed.’’
Easterbrook was caught by police after they received a tip-off about an armed robbery he was planning at a supermarket.
Flying Squad officers were lying in wait and arrested Easterbrook, but not before he had fired several shots, wounding a police inspector.
Easterbrook wanted to claim at his trial that Flying Squad marksmen operated a shoot-to-kill policy, saying one of his accomplices had surrendered but then been shot dead.
But his barrister refused to offer up this defence as it was not allowed at the time and when he was forced to represent himself, Easterbrook was again told he could not use the claim in court.
After being convicted of armed robbery and attempted murder, he was given a whole-life term.
But he refused to recognise his conviction and launched several legal challenges to the tariff.
As a result, the sentence was cut to 12-and-a-half years, allowing him to apply for parole in May 2000.
In 2003, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Easterbrook’s favour.
But he always refused to take part in the parole process, maintaining until his death that his conviction was unlawful.
Following the hearing, his sister-in-law’s son John Barden said he should now receive an apology from the Government.
The 49-year-old from Kent, said: “I think he (Easterbrook) is still owed an apology because he was in the right. He never denied the crime but it was the way it was dealt with.
“He (Easterbrook) was old school. He was a gentleman. He didn’t like being called a gangster – to him it was just what he was.”







9 Comments
by brian, coalville
Thursday, September 23 2010, 10:17PM
“How many people, who actually read the article, digested it fully? He was charged with the ATTEMPTED MURDER of a police officer! Not for MURDERING a police officer!!!
A jury would have found him guilty of this horrific crime! It was a judge who handed down the sentence! Had this man been just a petty thief, i very much doubt he would have received a life sentence!
Whatever he did, i feel that if he felt that he was unfairly treated, he was allowed to protest about his sentence in his own way after refusing his chance of parole! All he had asked for was an apology from the authorities!”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Thursday, September 23 2010, 2:32PM
“J,
I do not disregard all human life as I have seen too much death and destruction of life and bodies in my time in the Army. What I do disregard is this murderous individual's human life.
He took somebody else's, what happened to to the Police Officer's human life?”
by Graham, Whetstone
Thursday, September 23 2010, 1:59PM
“Ahh, is this a cover up?... could it be self starvation or was he underfed?”
by j, leic
Thursday, September 23 2010, 1:22PM
“Kulgan, I was talking about your disregard for human life.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Thursday, September 23 2010, 12:29PM
“J,
Only just read your bit about me sounding like a wannabe gangster.
If I have come across as that (although I have re-read it and it doesn't seem like that to me) I was not my intent. I am part of the law-abiding majority as I have too much respect for myself and Rule of Law to be a 'wannabe gangster'.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Thursday, September 23 2010, 10:31AM
“I feel for this criminal's family as they have lost a loved one.
That being said, I feel nothing for this 'so-called gentlemen'. He was nothing but a murderer who admitted that he committed the crime.”
by j, leic
Thursday, September 23 2010, 10:27AM
“Kulgan, for gods sake, lets not be so flippant about the loss of a human life; you sound like one of these wannabe gangsters.”
by j, leic
Thursday, September 23 2010, 10:25AM
“"¿He (Easterbrook) was old school. He was a gentleman. He didn¿t like being called a gangster ¿ to him it was just what he was.¿
WTF???!!! Errr, sorry doll but no, he wasn't, he was a scumbag who in just one incident of many terrorised innocent shoppers and workers at a supermarket, and shot a policeman who was simply doing his job. If that is your definition of a gentleman then god help you. The ironic thing is that this guy and his type somehow think they are better than the "nonces" they so despise!”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Thursday, September 23 2010, 9:54AM
“One less criminal the state has to pay to keep incarcerated.”