Leicester city mayor 'in talks over future of fire-hit factory'
Sir Peter Soulsby has had discussions with landowners interested in redeveloping an historic fire-damaged factory.
The mayor announced last month that Leicester City Council had bought the 18th century Donisthorpe building, a former textile factory in Bath Lane, following a blaze that wrecked the property in the summer.
-

Sir Peter said the £550,000 acquisition of the building and surrounding land was made so the council could spark a wider regeneration of the rundown area on the banks of the River Soar.
He has said he thought it would cost about £2 million to restore the property but that he envisaged passing it back into private hands for that work to be done.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
"I have had interesting discussions with landowners," he said.
"I do not necessarily intend that the council should retain ownership of the building long-term.
"If necessary, I would want to see the council invest in bringing the building back into use.
"But that is unlikely to be necessary because of the level of interest already generated."
Sir Peter declined to say who he had been in talks with but said there had been "two or three" parties involved.
He said: "We have a range of different potential uses, but I would be surprised if there was not a mixture of residential and employment land in the end.
"Having this building puts us in a position to take the lead with regenerating that part of town."
The Mercury asked Sir Peter if he was prepared to dispose of the site to a developer for less than it was bought for.
He said: "The short-term costs will be outweighed by the long-term benefits of regeneration of the area.
"In other parts of town, we have seen bold initiatives by the council unlock regeneration."
Stuart Bailey, chairman of Leicester Civic Society, said a planning document prepared by the city council about the site before the fire suggested the land around the factory could be used for family housing while the building itself could be converted into apartments.
He said: "That's a good idea, but I can see how the factory could also be used as offices.
"I know of at least one developer very interested in the site which has a good track record of this kind of project.
"I never thought the council would want to hang on to the building for long and I would not be surprised if it was sold quite quickly."




Comments
by braunstoneboy
Thursday, December 27 2012, 1:38PM
“Sorry ,clicked out too soon.............
Is there one ,just one ,building that this council has been involved in that has not cost tax payers a fortune.
Still paying for the former tourist info office,but paying rents that even Starbucks walked away from for the new one .
Haymarket Theatre !
As an aside to this comment....pete and his my little ponies,went into a £2000 a week contract for a company for gum removal off the streets,earlier this year.Anyone notice?
The next woderfull action by the clowncil is the selling off the remaining street cleaning machines in april .”
by braunstoneboy
Thursday, December 27 2012, 1:22PM
“Welford Place was a speculative building,built with a life span of 20 years.British Rail were to take it,but changed there minds.Leicester clowncil took it on.We now have to pay to demolish it. !”
by Bob491
Sunday, December 16 2012, 9:32PM
“Sir Peter Soulsby is great for Leicester isn't he.
He is supported by the vast majority, with just a few sad internet trolls against.”
by blackkat
Sunday, December 16 2012, 6:34PM
“I like the idea pete is in discussions.Same as with the discussions about gypsy sites?same as the"hut" in Thurnby Lodge?
What is surprising ,so far,is that De Mont Uni have not shown an interest.If they did.."BINGO" gone !”
by democrat
Sunday, December 16 2012, 5:58PM
“Don
Keeping it quiet by talking to the LM about it?
Great strategy.
Sir Peter could sell water to a thirsty man (but it would end up running at a loss).”
by DonHenson
Sunday, December 16 2012, 4:03PM
“It's usual in early stages of negotiation to keep details quiet - commercial sensitivity. Good business. But of course this means I'll be joining the red arrows!”
by LewisC109
Sunday, December 16 2012, 3:48PM
“pete and his magic money tree”
by spalding1944
Saturday, December 15 2012, 5:21PM
“I see he didn't answer the direct question, surprise , surprise”
by garju52
Saturday, December 15 2012, 10:54AM
“"wooliback" We all know what the word is.”
by LestaLM
Saturday, December 15 2012, 10:10AM
“If these developers are so keen now then why were they not so keen before the council bought the site ?”