Leicestershire crime chief candidates to appear at hustings
The three people taking part in the race to become Leicestershire's first police and crime commissioner will appear at a hustings tonight.
Mercury editor Richard Bettsworth will chair the public question-and-answer session, organised by the Chartered Management Institute and Neighbourhood Watch.
-

Suleman Nagdi, Sarah Russell and Sir Clive Loader
It will take place at the Holiday Inn, St Nicholas Circle, Leicester city centre, between 7pm and 9pm.
The Conservatives have chosen recently-retired Air Chief Marshall Sir Clive Loader, a parish councillor in Wing, Rutland, as their candidate for the post, while the Labour Party has selected Leicester's assistant mayor Sarah Russell.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Leicester community worker and businessman Suleman Nagdi is standing as an independent.
The event is the first in a series of hustings.
The CMI and Neighbourhood Watch are also holding a session at Rutland County Museum, Catmose Street, Oakham, tomorrow, between 7pm and 9pm.
The Diocese of Leicester is staging an event at Emmanuel Church, Forest Road, Loughborough, at 7.30pm on Monday, October 29, and Leicestershire Chamber of Commerce will hold a hustings in De Montfort University's Hugh Aston building, the Newarke, at 7.15pm on Wednesday, October 31.




Comments
by Peter20101
Tuesday, October 23 2012, 9:16AM
“CGLee - absolutely and this really saddens me
A recent Blaby District Council election, had a winner who polled something like 425 votes and won!
I beleive in voting, and will in this election, even though I disagree with it and would vote for none of the above, IF there was an official box to tick - but at present I am confused who to vote for as I know none of the candidates and have no information to help me decide
My worry for democracy at present is that if we (the public) do not use our vote, then some politician or council will choose to take it away from us, (as we dont vote anyway, why spend the money) in a form of use it or lose it!”
by CGLee
Tuesday, October 23 2012, 8:37AM
“So what you haven't said, Peter20101, but what could indeed happen,is that there is a distinct possibility that the winning candidate could well have polled less than 5% of the possible votes!”
by Peter20101
Tuesday, October 23 2012, 7:35AM
“"Here is a genuine question.
What is the position if there are more "spoilt papers" than votes for the candidates?
With the turnout expected to be very low (18.5% is suggested) and with 3 candidates, you could suggest, having read many posts and stories online that there will be a high proportion of spoilt papers as a protest against the candidates, parties and the process itself. So if 5% of the electorate spoilt their paper and voted for "none of the above" that's could be more than 25% of the suggested turnout and be one of the higher votes (so to speak) - if it was more than that what would be the reaction f the authorities & public alike?"”
by VanguardPawn
Tuesday, October 23 2012, 3:28AM
“It'll be interesting to see which candidate resorts to demagoguery to push people's buttons.”
by garyb2011
Monday, October 22 2012, 10:36PM
“Bob
Hillsborough?
96?
Ring any bells?”
by Bob491
Monday, October 22 2012, 10:09PM
“Quote: "One dimensional - as ever"
Why do you always accuse others of your own faults garyb?
Unlike you, I prefer equality I like diversity and I do not despise the police (or other less wealthy professions). That's why I stopped voting Con long ago.”
by IvanTheGreat
Monday, October 22 2012, 10:06PM
“Dear Bob491,
By your constant comments on here I guess your not a fan of the Conservative party?
Also you recommend Sarah Russell. Is this the same Sarah Russell that I've witnessed doing her knitting whilst sitting in council meetings? She is so focused on her knitting I'm sure she would make a great police commissioner , especially at the expense of the local tax payer.”
by garyb2011
Monday, October 22 2012, 9:36PM
“Bob
One dimensional - as ever”
by mole74
Monday, October 22 2012, 9:23PM
“If people don't want an elected commissioner then it isn't undemocratic to abstain from voting. Although I normally vote Labour, I cannot bring myself to vote for Sarah Russell. This is partly because of her dreadful track record as a councillor, but mainly because of the way she behaved since becoming one of Soulsby's well paid mini-mayors. It's not that long ago that Russell, Soulsby and the rest of the Council's cabinet pushed for a massive pay increase. To me this smacks of poor judgement and shows contempt for the people of Leicester. For these reasons (and because I don't want to see yet more elected officials on the gravy train), I'll be spoiling my ballot paper and abstaining in person on election day.”
by Bob491
Monday, October 22 2012, 8:23PM
“So garyb, you dislike equality and diversity, and also despise the police.
No wonder you are a Con. Perhaps you think Cons are born to be the ruling class too!”