MP backs residents in waste incinerator fight

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Profile image for This is Leicestershire

This is Leicestershire

Campaigners have turned out in force to demand that councillors scrap plans that could result in an incinerator being built on their doorstep.

Residents and politicians, including North West Leicestershire MP David Taylor, yesterday expressed anger at Leicestershire County Council buying two plots of land in Bardon, near Coalville.

At a protest at County Hall, in Glenfield, yesterday, they accused the council of trying to dump its problems on their area by considering a waste-treatment facility there.

They say, in the last year, the council has also attempted to use the district for controversial schemes such as travellers' sites and a possible alternative to the Pennbury eco-town.

Coun Nicholas Rushton, cabinet member for waste, told protesters the land in Bardon would be offered to private companies, which would bid to divert up to half the county's waste away from landfill by 2015.

However, waste businesses would also have the choice to use Whetstone tip, or even come up with their own location, of which he believes there are likely to be at least six.

County Hall has found that the best option to reduce the rubbish it buries would be to incinerate it.

However, the council says no final decision on the technology has been made. It is up to the companies to offer their solutions.

Council studies found that the only other viable option would be to have a ball mill, which sorts household waste mechanically, similar to the one in Beaumont Leys, Leicester.

MP Mr Taylor said: "I think this has been appallingly handled. If this was built in Bardon, it would damage the area economically, environmentally and socially.

"The problems that the county council seems to have are being sent in our direction."

For three months after buying the Bardon land, at Interlink Business Park, council bosses had refused to discuss the site's location.

Councillors were told they would be disciplined if they spoke out, as the information was commercially sensitive.

County councillor Paul Hyde said: "My democratic right to represent this community has been stopped by a gagging order."

Residents have set up the Ellistown and Battleflat Incinerator Action Group.

Chairman David Perrins said: "There are significant health risks with incineration and Friends of the Earth agree with this."

The council will hear next week whether the Government will provide half of the £130 million cost of the facility chosen.

If successful, waste companies will be invited to bid for the contract from October, with the winner, which will pay the other £65 million, announced in May 2010.

Coun Rushton said: "No decisions have been taken on the kind of facility, nor a site."

11
Tweet this article
Report

11 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by Pete, Leicestershire

    Thursday, September 25 2008, 2:09PM

    “Mr Goodyear appears to have very little grasp of planning issues, clearly evident from his recent nonsense-based arguments regarding the Charnwood Forest, which I am shocked to see that so far he hasn't trawled out in this debate. An EIA would be a pre-requisite for any planning application for an incinerator, but you can only do a proper EIA when you have all the facts about a proposal.
    Just cheap political moves from this chap once again.”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by K, Leicester

    Thursday, September 25 2008, 1:46PM

    “Eric Goodyear, what have your Labour colleagues done for the city of Leicester?NOTHING. Yes we have the lovely new Higcross extension, but that was built with private finance.
    If Labour are so good, why are they so far behind in the polls?
    Plans for a waste plant in South Wigston were recently thrown out by the Tory run County Council.”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by Keith Kondakor, Nuneaton

    Thursday, September 25 2008, 1:31PM

    “The PFI bribe from DEFRA only pays around 1/6th the cost as long as the go via the PFI funding route. The PFI is like a loan shark deal tieing the council to pay millions just to cover the debt.

    We have seen a very big fall in waste in the county and spending £20m per year on a burner is mad. From the early projections it looked like they would spend about £107 per tonne burned. If is far cheaper and flexable to do more recycling.

    it is also worth looking at the zero waste movement that is big in places like new zealand and bath!”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by claire, ellistown

    Thursday, September 25 2008, 12:13PM

    “I did ask my guest about the allegations issued by a prime time media production the other day, which would never in any way have any biased focus towards popular public opinion or sensationalism, and he pointed out that there could be a number of reasons for that newspaper being found in a land fill site. Who knows? But i dont think its definitive proof and to my mind its not a reason to not recycle.”

  • Profile image for This is Leicestershire

    by Barry Smth, Mowmacre hill

    Thursday, September 25 2008, 12:08PM

    “Where I live we have the Biffa ball mill and the staff have gone out of there way to reduce the smell.
    However I am curious as to why so many people are now getting environmentally concerned as long as it is not on their back door.
    Since incineration has to be done in such a way as to keep the environment to a safe level surely a consequence is within tolerable limits.
    This is not about politics it is about not destroying the planet and i do believe that Canada has an incredible record for recycling at 96%.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article