New city nightclub approved in Leicester's cultural quarter despite dozens of complaints

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, December 05, 2012
Profile image for Leicester Mercury

Leicester Mercury

A new nightclub in the heart of Leicester's cultural quarter has been given the go-ahead – despite opposition from dozens of residents.

A panel of city councillors approved a licensing application to open Dielectric in the basement of a Victorian building opposite Curve theatre, turning the former G-Spot sex club into a venue for live bands and club nights.

  1. Promoter Tim Sturgess

    Promoter Tim Sturgess

Promoter Tim Sturgess has already held a number of club nights at Dielectric, having been granted temporary licences, but he was given permanent permission to open at a city council hearing on Thursday.

Ahead of the hearing at the town hall, 50 people living near to the Rutland Street venue sent identical letters of objection to the city council's licensing department, asking it not to grant approval for the venue.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Sunday, May 26 2013

They were concerned about an increase crime and disorder.

Coun Mian Myatt, who was on the deciding panel, said: "There were representations from residents but within the locality there are premises just across the road which are similar in licensing terms.

"This one was capable of holding 180 people and it would be controlled and because it is in the cellar, the level of noise would not be as much as others in the vicinity."

He said police recommendations were included in the approved licence, such as use of sufficient and qualified door staff, a maximum capacity of 180 people and a 1.30am closing time on Sundays.

It is understood the premises will be up and running before Christmas.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for owler

    by owler

    Friday, December 28 2012, 9:44AM

    “k”

  • Profile image for Housepet

    by Housepet

    Friday, December 07 2012, 4:08PM

    “Wait and see just how long it will last............my guess 'not long!”

  • Profile image for sayno2socks

    by sayno2socks

    Thursday, December 06 2012, 10:38PM

    “@Oldhenry

    And you suggest working in a factory is a 'proper job'? No offense to factory workers, but these types of roles are often the most mind-numbing repetitive dead-end jobs you can ever find yourself trapped in. I should know as I've been there, and it took me a long time to climb out and get a job with actual career prospects.

    I'm not a big fan of nightclubs however this will also be also a venue for bands to play at. I can not imagine it will be furnished to a high standard but these places often are not - such as the Charlotte.

    I would prefer the building to be converted to something nicer than a toilet venue, but in the meantime, I still think it will be better than an empty building.

    And those drinkers won't necessarily be new drinkers, they'll be existing people already in the city, so no further burden on the NHS, Police, or an increase of the alcohol problem.”

  • Profile image for daveb0360

    by daveb0360

    Thursday, December 06 2012, 8:46PM

    “sayno2socks

    Actually, an empty building would be FAR better than another booze club. An empty building has the following benefits: -
    1. No burden on the NHS
    2. No special Police operation to control the fallout
    3. No addition to the city's puke and urine filth.
    4. Doesn't add to the problem of youth drunkenness

    And yes, it IS parasitic because it preys on the inability of the younger population to think of other ways to have 'fun'.”

  • Profile image for Oh_come_on

    by Oh_come_on

    Thursday, December 06 2012, 8:34PM

    “Oldhenry - jobs such as those provided by a night club are often the first step on the leader for young people. They provided wages for students to help support themselves etc. They give the opportunity for young people to show they can commit to a job which also has unsociable hours and gives them experience in dealing with the public. All good skills to put on a CV and increase your future employability. They provide employment for door men. They help to support the drinks industry which again provides more employment. people have a free choice whether to go to them our not so I don't see your problem. We have already seen that prohibition doesn't work, or would you prefer the industry to become a black market one?”

  • Profile image for oldhenry

    by oldhenry

    Thursday, December 06 2012, 7:29PM

    “My reasoning is that nighclubs are not a real buisness stems from the fact that they employ workers at very low wages with no career prospects. The manager may well have some but most others will be on the fringe of a living wage. The clientle will be fairly young people spending money that they should be saving for setting themselves up in life, or spending parents' cash given to them for studying in Leicester. Drinking must be curtailed anyway, has anyone noticed the proposed minimum levels of price for alcohol?
    The whole nightclub 'culture' is not a way of growing the ecomony but of making a quick buck by buinsessmen. It is not sustainable and will not lead to a development of long term empoyment in Leicester - or anywhere else. But it is symtomatic of what is wrong with cities in the UK. I suggest readers look into the longer term requirements of a country with regard to sustainable employment. This is akin to running an economy by 'cutting each others' hair. Think it through , it does not work , otherwise we could all have hundreds of hair salons along the High Street.”

  • Profile image for joe-bloggs

    by joe-bloggs

    Thursday, December 06 2012, 5:00PM

    “henry...i thought that sups and his Muppets want businesses to come to the city.this enterprise will succeed on its merits .if people can get to it and enjoy it,it will work.i have some time for "residents",but if i wanted a real quiet life ,i would not live in the city centre.”

  • Profile image for sayno2socks

    by sayno2socks

    Wednesday, December 05 2012, 6:29PM

    “Oldhenry, are you from the past?

    It's better than an empty building, is it not?”

  • Profile image for f007e

    by f007e

    Wednesday, December 05 2012, 4:09PM

    “oldhenry - they're a business where people have fun. Which bit of that don't you approve of? I'm curious how you think it's 'parasitic'? Businesses tend to (unless they're Amazon et al) pay tax, and employ people who perhaps would otherwise be claiming benefits. To my mind that's the opposite of 'parasitic'.

    Anyway, instead of complaining about a business man starting a business of which you don't approve, perhaps take your own advice and open a factory? Otherwise you're just sat in front of your computer contributing nothing but criticism of those who are contributing something.”

  • Profile image for oldhenry

    by oldhenry

    Wednesday, December 05 2012, 3:58PM

    “is this all Leicester can do now? Please open new factories to make things and employ people doing real jobs. Night clubs are just a 'parasitic' part of the nations' downfall.
    If you call that 'culture', well I do not.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article