Should Richard III be laid to rest in Leicester? (POLL)

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Profile image for This is Leicestershire

This is Leicestershire

If remains unearthed in a car park are verified as those of King Richard III, they should be laid to rest at Leicester Cathedral, a Labour MP has said.

Jon Ashworth, MP for Leicester South, told MPs during business questions in the Commons that the “potentially exciting discovery'' could “hugely benefit'' Leicester's tourism.

  1. Richard III

    Richard III

Addressing Leader of the House of Commons Andrew Lansley, he said: “Could we have a debate on tourism and would the Leader of the House agree with me that the potentially exciting discovery of the remains of Richard III in a Leicester city car park has the potential to hugely benefit the city of Leicester in terms of tourism? And would he also agree with me that if those remains do turn out to belong to Richard III they should be laid to rest at Leicester Cathedral?"

Mr Lansley responded: "I fear I probably best not venture into the latter point, but I must say I've followed this archaeological inquiry with very great interest and I think it is an exciting potential discovery."

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013


Mr Ashworth tweeted after the exchange in the Commons: “Just now said in Commons that if the remains found in Leicester do belong to #RichardIII they should be laid to rest in Leicester Cathedral.”

Do you think Richard III should be laid to rest in Leicester if the remains are his? Add your vote to the poll and tweet your views to reporter Laura Elvin @egoelvin You can follow Richard III @richard_third on Twitter too.


Archaeologists searching for the lost grave of Richard III have unearthed a skeleton with a metal arrow in its back which they believe could be the remains of the monarch.

The skeleton was exhumed from a car park behind council offices in Leicester last Tuesday during an archaeological dig by a team from the University of Leicester, and is being subjected to laboratory analysis.

It was found in what is believed to be the choir of the Grey Friars church, the site of which was also uncovered during the three-week archaeological dig and which is believed to be the burial site of the monarch, according to historical records.

Initial examinations have revealed it to be the skeleton of an adult male and the remains are said to be in a good condition. The skeleton also has a curved spine, which could fit reports of the monarch's appearance.

Richard III died in the Battle of Bosworth in 1485.

Related articles:

Richard III dig: Open days at Greyfriars site in Leicester car park

Richard III dig: Eyes of world on Leicester as Greyfriars skeleton find revealed

Richard III dig: King's remains 'will stay in Leicester'

Should Richard III be laid to rest in Leicester? (POLL)

Skeleton with 'battle injuries' found by Richard III dig team in Leicester

Human remains found in search for King Richard III at Leicester car park

Medieval dig confirms site of old church

‘Lost garden’ unearthed in Richard III dig at Leicester car park

Is King buried in Leicester car park? Dig to search for Richard III's remains

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for Vespa51

    by Vespa51

    Wednesday, March 13 2013, 6:35PM

    “I have no argument over the casket design but I do have reservations as to where he will be interred. As a Roman Catholic King his Final resting place was in keeping with that. He was ignominiously treated and dumped in the ground. He now needs to rest in peace in a manner suiting his status and faith.”

  • Profile image for woolypony

    by woolypony

    Saturday, September 15 2012, 6:38PM

    “Wholeheartedly agree with this statement by morriarty1:

    "Greyfriars Priory should be excavated more and preserved since this is what will draw the tourists into the city, not a pile of bones. As for Richard's remains, they should be buried at York Minster since that is where the king wished to be buried, not where he was betrayed, killed and defiled. This is as about respecting human dignity as well as uncovering the truth about the events of 1485."”

  • Profile image for GIBBO

    by GIBBO

    Saturday, September 15 2012, 11:19AM

    “My Right to reply to David 5566
    My suggestion and recommendation is to leave Richard in his grave in the Greyfriars Priory ruin foundation - the car park came later and can be readily removed allowing a fitting monument to be placed for all to see as was provided earlier in 1600. The appropriate burial rights in accordance with the Church of Rome will have been done as Richard was laid in sanctified ground within the priory special place chosen by the Roman Catholic Church Friars for a man they saw of importance and high standing even after death.
    The car park area gives us a real opportunity to develop and display a real slice of history for all to wonder reflect and enjoy.
    The cathedral site is not appropriate is my opinion – Leave well alone – why should Richard be taken from his place of rest he has enjoyed to this present day be moved for current day convenience?”

  • Profile image for MjCclarke

    by MjCclarke

    Saturday, September 15 2012, 9:00AM

    “Just to complete my last entry: "a new pub The Bosworth (now gone) was built on King Richard's Road about 700 yards from West Bridge. My isolated comment "Amateur dramatics" should have read and at one time a very successful amateur dramatics group carried the name KRR Players" Leicester's old West End was proud of its association with KRRIII”

  • Profile image for MjCclarke

    by MjCclarke

    Friday, September 14 2012, 11:41PM

    “The longest ever Cold Case! Even though the belief of the maligned KRIII being tossed into the River Soar could be dispelled there is no reason whatsoever to cast aside the content of the West Bridge plaque recording the sooth sayer's forecast that "where his spur sfruck the ancient bridge on his way to Bosworth so would his head on return from battle". If it is decided the remains are his and should be re-interred in Leicester, West Bridge was the medieval route west out of the City towards Bosworth and the existing bridge should have amended plaques as part of a KRR trail
    Just as the site of the former of the old Blue Boar Inn, Highcross Street where he stayed before the battle. Leicester has always appeared to want to identify with this erstwhile monach, naming three schools after him: KRR Infants, King Richard III Girls, KRRIII. Boys at road: King, Richard's Road, at one time even a Working Men's Club KRR WMC and in the 1960's a brand new pub opened bearing the name The Bosworth
    Amateur Drama groups”

  • Profile image for ghostof66

    by ghostof66

    Friday, September 14 2012, 10:16PM

    “He was laid to rest in Leicester and therefore that's where he should remain.”

  • Profile image for david5566

    by david5566

    Friday, September 14 2012, 10:12PM

    “If you had read the whole statement from Jon Ashworth White_King, you would have noticed that the MP was suggesting that the remains be re buried at Leicester Cathedral, the only thing that would be on display is a new tomb for an anointed King of England, his remains would be inside like every other tomb on earth, it's better than laying under a car park, which is not the place for a former monarch.”

  • Profile image for GIBBO

    by GIBBO

    Friday, September 14 2012, 7:09PM

    “Leave well alone
    We have now found the last resting place of a man we now believe to be Richard 111 - Whilst his bones are visible the ground within his grave bears the shadow of the rest of his body - It is my view that he was buried in a holy place where sanctuary was that of a special place within the grey friars place of God and prayer - It is wrong in my opinion to move this mans remains to another place an act of defiling one of our kings graves - We should re invent the placed structures which defile this place of God and leave an important member of Leicester's buried dead to rest in peace.
    Moving remains is creating a peep show of our past is not on – Robbing tombs should be a thing of the past – when will we ever become civilized.
    To move this man to the Cathedral or other place defeats what we are attempting to do preserving our historic past where it is,
    Are we discovering the past or moving the past around for todays convenience,

    Signed: A Leicester God believing man who cares about our historic past
    14/09/2012”

  • Profile image for birkinshaw_t

    by birkinshaw_t

    Friday, September 14 2012, 6:57PM

    “The Cathedral, Mary de Castro or St Nicholas. Fotheringhay, where he was born, and where his parents and brother were/are buried, is the only other place that has a claim on Richard.”

  • Profile image for morriarty1

    by morriarty1

    Friday, September 14 2012, 3:16PM

    “Greyfriars Priory should be excavated more and preserved since this is what will draw the tourists into the city, not a pile of bones. As for Richard's remains, they should be buried at York Minster since that is where the king wished to be buried, not where he was betrayed, killed and defiled. This is as about respecting human dignity as well as uncovering the truth about the events of 1485.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article