Row over £2.4m art gallery plan in Leicester's New Walk
Opposition councillors have described the design of a new art gallery planned for Leicester's New Walk as "architectural vandalism."
Leicester City Council wants the £2.4m gallery to be an international-quality venue .
-

An artist's impression of the £2.4m art gallery proposed for Leicester's New Walk. Its modern design is controversial
A motion to be put to a full council meeting next Thursday by Conservative leader Ross Grant says the modern glass and steel design is out of character with the area.
He also claims building the large modern structure on New Walk breaks the council's own guidelines for developments within a conservation area, a claim the authority denies.
Coun Grant said: "I was left with no option than to put a motion to council to try and stop it committing an act of architectural vandalism on New Walk, breaking hundreds of years of planning protection, and threatening the future of the conservation area.
"The council appears to be acting with one set of rules for itself and another for everyone else."
An original £1.1m estimate for the gallery was drawn up by council officers, but now consultants have said that in order to attract exhibitions from all over the world, the new facility will have to cost about £2.4m.
The council agreed to spend this amount last month, despite questions from opposition councillors about the rise in cost.
The council says this was why the decision was exempted from being "called in" by the opposition, an option normally available to councillors who want to look into a decision in more detail.
Coun Grant said: "The public will think the council is acting hypocritically and will not understand why Labour have yet again stopped any public debate."
But cabinet member for culture Councillor Andy Connelly said: "The no call-in was made because it would have delayed the project and increased the costs, which is what people were complaining about.
"Councillor Grant is picking and choosing parts of the council's guidelines while ignoring those which disprove his arguments.
"This motion shows yet again how the Tories are just not interested in investing in our city.
"I would say the design is very much in keeping with New Walk. In fact, it is 100 times better than the building next to it. There is no doubt that it will contribute positively to the area."
The proposed gallery, close to New Walk Museum, will feature two large rooms, a balcony gallery, shops and a cafe.
The Arts Council has pledged £100,000 but the rest will come from the council's coffers, including a VAT rebate received by the authority this year.
People on New Walk yesterday told the Mercury what they thought of the design.
Teacher Fatimah Khan, 26, said: "It will look totally out of place if it's entirely made out of glass and steel."
Kyle Brand, 27, of Evington, said: "They should build it somewhere else, like the main city centre, alongside other attractions such as Highcross and the Curve theatre.
"They should leave the New Walk area just as it is."
But Jennifer Murphy, 24, of Highfields, said it was a "great idea". She said: "I think New Walk is slightly dull and needs a change."







13 Comments
View all
by Si, Leicester
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 2:52PM
“What is it with the Council at the moment? First the secrecy over Bowstring Bridge, and now this decision can't be "called in" by opposition Councillors. Everyone can see it goes against the aims of the conservation area, but Labour is still pushing ahead with these plans.”
by R, Leicester
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 2:21PM
“Carl, there is absolutely no reason why LCC couldn't convert that building into an art gallery AND still stay within the protection rules. This whole fuss is purely because the council are to ignorant or indifferent towards developing the city in a sensitive way.”
by Arthr Collln, Braunstone Town
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 2:19PM
“I know!
What about putting glass sides on the Bowstring bridge. It would make the longest art gallery, probably in the world, and that would solve two problems in one go, and a few million cheaper!!!!”
by J.R, N.V
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 2:13PM
“Yet another case of this current council wanting to do away with the historical parts of Leicester. Lets put up a totally out of place modern building in a conservation area. Lets all remember who is to blame for these events when we next cast our votes.”
by Carl, Leicester.
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 1:52PM
“Probably not but then again nothing would get built if the people had to give there approval for everything. Mind you i get the feeling opposition is partly based on the Councils decision to knock down the Bowstring Bridge. By the way my view on that is by all means keep the bridge but it must be maintained and fulfill a purpose.”
by r, Leicester
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 1:29PM
“Carl, should LCC be allowed to add another?”
by Carl, Leicester
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 1:11PM
“I find it strange that this development is being described as a form of architectural vandalism when there are a number of modern buildings which could be argued are equally ugly lining the New Walk.”
by R, Leicester
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 12:54PM
“I don't think anyone is against having a new art gallery on New Walk in principle - it seems like a good location to me. The complaint is that the proposed design breaks planning rules designed to protect 200 year old New Walk from inappropriate developments. In particular, the new proposal would stick out instead of being flush with the rest of the street which is not supposed to be allowed. Also, seeing as LCC are both the developer AND the local planning authority for this the potential for them to ride roughshod over any concerns people have. Oh, and then there's the price tag!”
by Ed, Leicester
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 12:24PM
“It's going where the old council nursery was. Was this pointed out to people being asked to comment on the plans?Because that building is not great and needs replacing anyway. New Walk, is (and has always been) a mix of buildings. Something new will not look out of place.
This is time and money wasting tactics by the conservatives who obviously have nothing better to do.”
by Tom, London
Wednesday, August 26 2009, 12:05PM
“Clearly Cllr Connelly doesn't understand the point of a conservation area. If the plan breaks any guidelines, it should not go ahead. Otherwise the council could similarly plan the demolition of any New Walk building. And meanwhile the centre of my home city crumbles into dust..”