School results at new record
Primary school children in Leicester have recorded some of their best-ever test results – and are continuing to close the gap on the national average.
Government figures published today, based on tests last spring, show dramatic improvements in schools across the city.
-
Connor Smith
Schools in Leicestershire also continued to record good scores.
One school in Leicester, Eyres Monsell Primary, and two in the county, Orchard, in Broughton Astley, and Newbold Verdon, have been named among the top 30 schools in the entire country, out of nearly 15,000, for the amount pupils have progressed between the ages of seven and 11.
After many years when Leicester recorded the second lowest results in the country, the city is now 120th out of 148 authorities.
Coaching and one-to-one teaching sessions, which focus on helping individual children who are struggling, has helped improve results, head teachers say.
However, one area of concern is the number of schools that have failed to hit the Government's minimum target of 55% of children reaching the benchmark in English and maths.
Eleven schools in the city failed to do that this year, compared with eight the year before.
The Eyres Monsell's head, Sally Morrison, said specific teaching targeted at each pupils' needs contributed to their "amazing" progress.
She said: "We know exactly how each child is progressing so we can tailor teaching to their needs.
"We can then challenge each pupil so they can get the best results they possibly can."
Montrose School, in Aylestone, recorded the city's highest results, followed by Whitehall Primary and Linden Primary, both in Evington.
Marriott Primary, in Saffron Lane, which had among the worst results for several years, has shown a dramatic upturn in fortunes.
This year, 83% of pupils achieved the benchmark in English compared with 44%, in 2007.
Head Catherine Stretton said: "We've focused on high quality teaching and regular use of pupil assessment information so we can accurately pinpoint what children can and can't do, so that teachers can plan future lessons using that."
By contrast, Knighton Fields Primary had the city's lowest results, with just 31% achieving the Government benchmark in English.
Braunstone Primary and Barley Croft Primary, in Beaumont Leys, recorded the next lowest scores.
Margaret Libreri, director of Learning Services at Leicester City Council, said: "We're very pleased some schools, such as Marriott, have made significant improvements and we will continue to support schools still below the 55% floor target to overcome the challenges they face.
"This includes schools such as Knighton Fields, which has experienced a high level of turbulence over the year with a significant number of new pupils enrolling in the school."
Councillor Vi Dempster, city council cabinet education spokeswoman, said she was delighted the results had narrowed the gap betweenLeicester and the national average to three percentage points.
She said: "Support packages, including improved ways of assessing pupil progress for targeted help, have paid off."
Highfields Primary, Montrose, Taylor Road, in St Matthew's, Sparkenhoe, in Highfields, Stathern, near Melton, and, Warren Hills, in Coalville, all recorded some of the country's best "pupil progress" scores.
Six schools in the county all achieved a 100% pass rate in the three subjects but the county is now 53rd out of 152 local authorities, down from 49th last year.
Results show 76% of 11-year-olds in city schools achieved the national benchmark in English, the same as last year; 77% in maths, up three points; and 86% in science, up two.
Nationally, the averages are 80%, 79% and 88%
In Leicestershire, the results were: 82% in English, down two; 80% in maths, no change; and 89% in science, no change.







9 Comments
by Daniel, Leicester
Wednesday, December 02 2009, 9:33AM
“Didnt we have a news article not so many months back proving that children had not gotten smarter since the 70's. I believe there was an experiment with students resitting the 70's school exams and they all came out exactly the same. So this article is really saying that the pass marks are set alot lower than they were allowing more students to succeed. Or alternatively there only taught exactly whats on the exam sheet so when they finish school they have no working knowledge of anything else which if you think about it is pretty cruel to the students just so the govenment can fake its success! either way I am sure next years students will be the best yet! and the year after and the year after etc... until they will pass the exam just by turning up! all in the name of figures and targets huh.”
by sharon, newbold verdon
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 3:59PM
“Well done Newbold!!!”
by mrs c, leics
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 3:09PM
“I think Carl that these days people are busier and children spend more time on computers, watching tv and play stations and therefore perhaps spend less time sitting and doing things with parents as we did years ago, which is such a shame. I dont think money has anything to do with it although alot of people on the run down estates seem to have less ambition. I have a friend who teaches at one of the poor performance schools, they have parents picking up children with cans of beer in their hand, even drunk they arent going to take the children home and read or play games with them are they?.”
by Carl, Leicester
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 2:50PM
“Did parents in the past have a close working relationship with schools apart from attending parents evenings and sports days?I'm only asking as it seems since corporal punishment in schools was banned people seem to think parents in the past cared more about their kids education.”
by mrs c, leics
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 2:26PM
“Thats fantastic, but this is often down to a mixture of schools and parents, I am sure alot of the parents of the schools that are really struggling are not doing as much as the parents from the successful schools. Well done to Pochin, Barkby, fantastic results year after year.”
by Carl, Leicester
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 2:09PM
“How do you define winners and losers anyway. The way i see it the ones with the money and great jobs are the winners and rest of us are the losers.”
by John Motson, The Commentary Box
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 1:59PM
“Oh a fantastic result for the primary school children is leicester, good game good game. GOAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL”
by Nick, Leicestershire
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 12:41PM
“Congratulations to all concerned. At least its an improvement.
**Having said that though our education system is so dumbed down nowadays its no wonder we've dropped well over a dozen places in the world rankings for Maths (now 24th) and English Reading (now 22nd). Remember though, everyone has to be a WINNER nowadays!!! No more excellence and losers.**”
by mr a, nwl
Tuesday, December 01 2009, 11:42AM
“it is only two points dropped...
does it matter?
I have a 100-1 bet that the foxes will beat Man U next season...
WHAT?
WHO is offering 10000-1??”