Transport plans 'will get voters on board'
Slashing speed limits outside schools and more flashing road signs are among plans to improve the transport network.
The three main parties fighting for seats in the county council elections next month all want to reduce accidents.
-

Bus services are one area parties are looking at
They also want to get more people on to public transport – by offering better bus services or more concessionary fares.
Labour leader Councillor Matthew O'Callaghan said his party wanted more 20mph speed limits outside schools and to reopen disused bus and train stations.
He said: "The abolition of the district highways offices by the Conservatives has resulted in a poorer service.
"Labour would bring them back, allowing residents to determine local priorities, such as 20mph zones, school safe routes or speed activated signs. Bypasses for Melton, Lutterworth and Kegworth will be a priority.
"We will look at opening closed stations and rail lines, including the National Forest line.
"The county invests heavily in subsidising bus routes and school buses. We will look at the potential of a jointly run county bus service to deliver a better service for the money we spend.
"Labour would switch the money for expensive initiatives, such as Oyster Cards and personalised travel plans, to concessionary fares for carers, companions of the elderly and young people."
Liberal Democrat spokesman councillor Sarah Hill said getting more people out of cars and on to buses and trains was key.
"The theme is to increase use of public transport to ease congestion and create a better alternative to local travel by car.
"This requires pushing for better investment in transport infrastructure, looking sensibly at the use of bypasses and further park-and-ride schemes.
"More money should be released by central Government to fund the concessionary travel scheme so the money doesn't have to come out of council tax.
"At the same time, we would get rid of the unsuccessful voucher scheme the Conservatives have introduced for young people and work toward a simple young person's fare.
"In addition, we would develop quality bus partnerships to create a fair service for people across the county.
"We will also work to provide 20mph zones in areas where the community requests them."
Conservative leader Councillor David Parsons said the party had done well in cutting accidents and introducing safety measures and wanted to continue this work.
"Over the past four years we have reduced road accidents by 66%, speeding by 12% and have installed 72 Speedwatch schemes and 230 vehicle-activated signs.
"A key priority is to further reduce congestion and promote uptake of public transport.
"We will not be pursuing work-based charging schemes or supporting pay-as-you-drive technologies.
"We have to bear in mind that the Labour Government is keen to introduce these measures, and we may very well be forced into taking unpopular action.
"Conservatives will introduce Smartcards allowing easier and faster travel and will explore their use on train services also.
"We will also introduce technology that will allow individual travel plans to people so they can plan journeys with ease.
"Confusion over timetabling is a major cause on non-take-up of public transport and this is something we are determined to sort out.
"Finally, we will make our school buses safer with extra inspectors and more CCTV."







10 Comments
by Steve Leonard, Kirby Muxloe
Wednesday, May 27 2009, 1:44PM
“You really do have too much time on your hands Eric, if you trawl the readers' comments looking for that little snippet. Your party is responsible for messing up the country's finances and cannot be trusted in Leicestershire. I'm voting for Parsons.”
by D Barrow, Leicester
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 1:47PM
“"We will not be pursuing work-based charging schemes or supporting pay-as-you-drive technologies.
"We have to bear in mind that the Labour Government is keen to introduce these measures, and we may very well be forced into taking unpopular action.
"Conservatives will introduce Smartcards allowing easier and faster travel and will explore their use on train services also.
"We will also introduce technology that will allow individual travel plans to people so they can plan journeys with ease.
"Confusion over timetabling is a major cause on non-take-up of public transport and this is something we are determined to sort out.
"Finally, we will make our school buses safer with extra inspectors and more CCTV."
Funny that, nothing there about cleaning up the dusgusting filth and mess left behind by people on nearly ever bus I travel on.”
by John Stitch, Leicester Town
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 12:36PM
“Well said, Paul. Slashing fares is unfortunately not all it takes - there are a large number of people out there who would still not use buses, probably even if you paid them.
Getting buses to move from A to B quicker, making them cleaner, quieter and more comfortable and free from use by criminals is what will get people using them more. So if fares are slashed, where's the revenue going to come from to do all that ?”
by Dave, H&B
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 12:33PM
“Well, as usual don't expect anything out of it, as soon as elections are gone, so will be the problem... (or at least the will to adress it).
Fact is that most lines are not financially viable although they are perfectly inadequate because of poor service (1 per hour, not running after 6pm or on week ends). The spider hub system bringing all busses to Leicester city centre is also a problem: they suffer of the congestions (of which they are a big part) and it takes forever if you want to go from the north/south to the east or west since you have to go in the centre to then go outside the centre. A multiple circles around Leicester of variopus diameters with 6-7 centre/outside lines to ensure interconnectivity would in my opinion a much more efficient system providing that you pay one single fare no matter how many changes you have to make on your journey.”
by Kate, Coalville
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 12:18PM
“It doesn't state it here, but I'm wondering how much research has gone into this by the 3 main parties. Have they actually surveyed the county on what changes we would like to see in our transport system, or, as usual, is this another 'we know best' idea?
I'm not interested in 'flashing signs' and '20mph outside of schools', as I don't have kids. As for train services, shall I mention the Ivanhoe line??
What does 'better bus services' actually mean? As an example: I've worked in Bardon for 11 years and despite several peitions for a regular bus route through the estate, it keeps getting turned down, saying that not enough people would use it. If there was a bus from Coalville to Bardon that got me to work on time, (not the 1 every hour job that skirts the estate currently) then of course I'd go to work on the bus. Do councillors realise how many people work on this estate? Do they care? Probably not, they'll just keep on telling us to use buses that don't get us to where we want to go, when we want to get there.
It's just the same old, same old...empty promises before a looming election.”
by PB, wigston
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 12:05PM
“"Liberal Democrat spokesman councillor Sarah Hill said getting more people out of cars and on to buses and trains was key"
A definite vote winner that one, lets "make" people use public transport. The Lib Dems policy on transport is one of the single biggest reasons people won't vote for them.”
by Dave, Leicester
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 11:44AM
“One of the reasons why the city is congested is that the plethora of traffic lights appear to have had their sequences designed to prevent through traffic flow.
The buses should have a cheap day ticket, usable on any service, not the bloated offering as at present.”
by Paul, Leicester
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 11:36AM
“Do any of these political idoits travel regularly on public transport??? Leicesters transport infrastructure is a shambles and well behind the times. 2nd most congested city in the UK behind London and 2nd most traffic signals per square mile in the UK.
IF they want to attract more people to public transport, there should be more park and rides and before that 24hr bus and taxi lanes.”
by Neil, Leicester
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 10:59AM
“Promises, promises.... pity none of them will ever happen, all swept under the carpet 1 second after the end of the election.”
by Eric Goodyer, unity house loughborough
Wednesday, May 20 2009, 8:39AM
“David Parsons has consistently opposed the re-opening of The National Forest Rail Line, undermined the City Tram Proposals which could offer a new line to service Thurmaston & Syston, ignored our call for new stations on the incredibly succesful Ivanhoe train line. His administration have messed up the finances for the Birstall Park & Ride scheme. He increased school bus fares from £60 to £240 per annum. His total lack of commitment to Public Transport is proven by his past policy failures. He has not even asked the East Midlands Train & Bus operators if they willing t0 co-operate on a cross service travel-card before making an annoucnement which he is unlikely to be able to deliver!”