Vasectomy 'bribe' is paid to Leicester drug addict
A drug addict from Leicester has become the first in the country to be paid to have a vasectomy.
The 38-year-old, known only as John, was given £200 by a controversial American group called Project Prevention.
-

The group pays people with drug and alcohol problems to be sterilised and its founder admits the money is "a bribe."
The group has now started targeting male and female addicts and alcoholics in Britain.
They claim this is to prevent children being born with addictions or born into dysfunctional families.
John, who has been addicted to opiates for 15 years, told the BBC's Inside Out television programme: "It was something that I'd been thinking about for a long time and something that I'd already made my mind up that I wanted to do but just hadn't got round to it."
He said he has been involved with drugs since he was 11 or 12 and admitted stealing in the past and dabbling in dealing drugs.
He said he would spend the money on overdue rent and shopping.
It has emerged that the boss of the GP practice where John had the procedure did not know the patient was being paid.
The BBC pictured him going to the Groby Road Medical Practice.
Practice manager Nick Thomas said: "I was not aware that this patient was being paid.
"Any patient who asks for a vasectomy has to see a clinician. They would be counselled by their GP and would have to consider the options available."
A leading drugs charity condemned the promise of cash for sterilisation.
Martin Barnes, chief executive of DrugScope, said: "It is a fundamental principle of the NHS constitution that all treatment should be both informed and consensual.
"We believe that offering cash incentives to often very poor and marginalised people in return for sterilisation runs directly counter to this.
"It is exploitative, ethically dubious and morally questionable."
Rod Moore, deputy director of public health at the primary care trust NHS Leicester City, said: "Vasectomies are available on the NHS and the British Medical Association has made clear the expectation that doctors approached by patients seeking such treatment need to be confident that the person is competent to make such a decision, and to inform the patient of the availability and benefits of reversible contraception.
"It is important that vulnerable people, such as those addicted to drugs, are counselled by their clinicians on the options available to them."
Professor David Field, Professor of Neonatal Medicine at the University of Leicester, questioned the need to pay people to be sterilised.
He said: "I'm not sure why this charity is targeting Britain. Antenatal care here is very different to the States where people with drug or alcohol addition are more dependent on local programmes."
Barbara Harris, from North Carolina, said she set up Project Prevention after she watched children struggle with addiction passed on by their mothers.
She said: "I got very angry about the damage these drugs do to these children." Mrs Harris said the money paid to addicts was "a bribe", and had attracted criticism.
She said: "I've been spat on. Typically I just say to my critics 'if you believe these women should continue to take drugs and have children, then step up in line and adopt their babies'."







16 Comments
View all
by fat tim, Cooooooolville
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 7:03PM
“Apart from the obvious fact that not all babies born into dangerous and unloving circumstances are not the children of drug addicts
Oooooops I wrote that wrong. I meant: "Apart from the obvious fact that not all babies born into dangerous and unloving circumstances are the children of drug addicts”
by fat tim, Cooooooolville
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 7:01PM
“Although babies being born to addicts is a terrible thing, bribing those addicts to give up that right is not the way forward. Apart from the obvious fact that not all babies born into dangerous and unloving circumstances are not the children of drug addicts, there is also the fact that not all addicts stay addicted and may go on to live a "normal" life. For the time being, however, the fact is that they ARE drug addicts so another question which I think needs to be asked of this charity is what do they think that drug addict is going to spend their £200 on?”
by Peter, Cambridge. Massachusetts
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 6:56PM
“I believe the UK branch of the Tea Party held their own 'Kristtalnacht' rally in Leicester the other day, but only managed to break one leg and a few windows. I think it is time for people here in the States to 'wake up and smell the coffee', as they say.....”
by martin, le3
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 6:16PM
“Peter, Cambridge. Massachusetts - interesting that it hits the headlines in the US. Project Prevention are a US based group and according to their web site they have paid addicts in all the US States.
They are one of several US imports that i think we could manage without! I just hope those T Party idiots stay the other side of the Atlantic too...”
by Peter, Cambridge. Massachusetts
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 5:25PM
“Well it is good to see Leicester make the news here in the States again:
Riots
Pantless Mayor
Sterilization bribe
The name Joseph Mengele comes to mind. I think this activity could be abused and that any 'birth control' method accepted by addicts must be reversable.”
by G, Leicester
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 3:38PM
“spellcheck STRENGTH sorry”
by G, Leicester
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 3:35PM
“First & foremost these addicts were not always addicts it was their choice to take drugs in the first place, I say good luck to whoever wants to stop babies being born with a drug addiction at least we are talking prevention here rather than cure & human rights GOD GIVE ME STRENGHT”
by Cathy, Leicester
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 2:48PM
“Nobody is forcing these people to take the money and get sterilised.
I ask you, if someone is willing to throw away the chances of having a child for a mere £200 then what kind of parent would they have been anyway???”
by natalie smith, Leicester
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 12:13PM
“I feel this is wrong for vulnerable people with an addiction. what a shame that the "stereotype" of a drug addict has been used here. I do agree that a baby should never be brought into a drug addicts life when they are at their worst as a parent should look after themselves in the first instance. However, this does not mean that somebody with an addiction cannot be a good parent, however it is not an ideal situation. What a shame we can't stop the people popping children out left right and centre that sit at home claiming benefits left right and centre too, and people bringing children into a violent relationship or one that is unstable...”
by anon, in rehab
Tuesday, October 19 2010, 12:05PM
“I would have a vasectomy for £200..
that would be. (in my estimation)
....9 bottles of vodka...
( besides, at my age I'm probably firing blanks anyway)
LOL”