Muslim women who wear face veils are suffering rise in abuse and hostility
Muslim women who wear face veils say they are seeing a rising tide of hostility and abuse because of the way they dress.
Women spoke out as police reported a sharp rise in crimes, ranging from verbal abuse to physical attacks, against Muslims in the past year.
-

Chief Inspector Bill Knopp, of Leicestershire police's community safety unit
Two women who wear the niqab, a veil which leaves only the eyes showing, said Leicester had become more "hostile" since the French Government said it planned to ban the garment and the burka, which covers the entire body.
The women also believe publicity surrounding Conservative MP Philip Hollobone's decision to refuse to meet constituents wearing veils had deepened public hostility.
Mr Hollobone, an MP in Northamptonshire, also attempted to introduce a private member's bill in the House of Commons to pave the way for a law similar to that being considered in France.
One of the women, a 29-year-old from Leicester's Clarendon Park, said: "There is a more hostile than usual atmosphere at the moment.
"I have been called names like ''Taliban'' and ''terrorist'' and one man, who was drunk in the middle of the day, told me to go back to where I came from.
"I just want to live my life in accordance with my faith, I don't see what harm I am doing by wearing the niqab.
"People talk about women who wear these garments being outside of society in some way. I was born and brought up in this country and don't want to live anywhere else.
"I have been to university and I have a well-paid job, I live by the law and I love my family. How am I not taking part in society?"
Another woman, aged 32, from Evington, Leicester, said: "Women are saying that they feel intimidated by some of the comments they hear in the media or in the street.
"There seems to be this feeling now that women who choose to dress this way are some kind of threat to the British way of life."
Police in Leicester have seen the number of cases of Muslims being verbally abused or physically assaulted rise in the past year.
Between April 2008 and March 2009, officers in the city recorded 25 offences. In the following 12 months, it rose to 42.
Chief Inspector Bill Knopp, of Leicestershire police's community safety unit, said: "Although the number of offences is relatively low, it's the trend that concerns us.
"We cannot be sure whether that rise reflects greater public confidence and people are coming to us when these things happen to them or an actual rise in incidents.
"What I do know is that we are getting better at catching the offenders."
Suleman Nagdi, spokesman for the Leicestershire Federation of Muslim Organisations, said meetings had taken place with police to discuss the recent incidents.
He said: "The figures the police have only show the number of women who have come forward to tell them about their experiences.
"I fear there are others who have been abused in this way but have never told anyone about it.
"There is a debate going on, but calling people names in the street is never part of any debate."
Leicestershire police have a new hate crime website.
www.stamp-it-out.co.uk







154 Comments
View all
by Lee, East Leicester
Saturday, July 24 2010, 8:36PM
“Oh j, leics you do make me smile.
Your "silly boy" comment makes you sound very juvenile, in fact just like a silly boy.Debate is debate and most adults can debate without resorting to name calling.Just to reiterate, yes I did say that hate preachers should be deported but no where did I say or imply that they where foreigners.That is again YOUR assumption.My reason for this comment was that if preachers of hate dislike Western values then as far as I am concerned they should be deported to an islamic state where, surely they would feel more at home.It does not matter to me where they originate from.You would have been better to have asked what was implied by my comment instead of just responding on impulse and misconception.Yes my origional post as been removed (maybe because some one flagged it as abuse eh j).I may be opinionated but racist? Never.Say no more.”
by John, Loughborough
Friday, July 23 2010, 11:44PM
“One thing that people seem to be missing here is that Islam is no more a "monolithic" religion than christianity. As with christianity one denomination/sect can have completely opposite views to another, while all adopt the label of the religion (although many muslims don't like admitting this as it is contrary to the koran). So one sect may consider a face veil mandatory whilst another might not. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_schools_and_branches.”
by fat tim, Coooooolville
Friday, July 23 2010, 8:39PM
“I think you missed my point Mr Leicester. As i understand it, one of your problems with the Burkha is to do with the fact that the wearing of one can lead to people using them to commit crimes with impunity. My point re police uniforms is that they can be used in much the same way apparently.”
by j, leic
Friday, July 23 2010, 7:02PM
“"I notice that not many people have commented on the fact that a muslim country such as Turkey has itsself banned the veil.......... Says it all really.
Rich, Leicestershire"
Err, yes, I did. Do you not remember? I'll remind you:
"No Rich, it tells me more about the current political and religious tensions present in Turkey. Surely you are aware of these?"
I thought your response was, again, a joke (you seemed to think I was talking about tensions around the veil in that country!!!!!!!!). Are you being wilfully silly again or are you really unaware of the (actual) political and religious tensions that are causing serious problems in the country?
There is a battle for supremacy between secular and Islamic politicians in the country. Both sides are attempting to assert their power and the banning of the burkha is an example of this from the secular side.”
by j, leic
Friday, July 23 2010, 6:35PM
“"Let me explain for the ignorant, Islam is a religious theology and NOT a race of people"
Absolutely correct Lee, but you gave away your true colours when you demanded that extremist preachers be deported, i.e. you see such preachers as being foreigners. Silly mistake silly boy.
And your original comment has now been removed by the moderators. Say no more.”
by j, leic
Friday, July 23 2010, 6:32PM
“Mr Leicester, I await your demand for Darth Vader outfits to be banned in the name of public safety:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1297087/The-Empire-Strikes-Bank-Armed-robber-dressed-Darth-Vader-demands-cash-daring-raid.html”
by Lee, East Leicester
Friday, July 23 2010, 4:27PM
“j, leics, abuse and name calling is a typical leftist form of attack."Racist", can you please tell me where I used any any racist comments.Let me explain for the ignorant, Islam is a religious theology and NOT a race of people.Muslims can come from any race and can be black, white or yellow.That blows you argument out of the water."Bigot", by your very response to my post it is you that is the bigot.As for the EDL, I am not and never will be associated with this organisation, so YOUR bigotted assumptions are again proved wrong.Before posting a response I suggest that you read up on defermation laws and then think seriously before you post your misconcieved vitriole.I will make no appologies for my views on Islam and who are you to dictate who can and can't post on here.You made no attempt to counter argue my points and I am as just as entitled to my point of view as you are to yours.A theology that encourages taqiyya is a theology that all need to be wary of.”
by Mr. Leicester, Leicester
Friday, July 23 2010, 3:45PM
“No Fat Tim. That was an actual police officer that used force for no apparent reason that lead to the death of a person.
This matter has been investigated accordingly.
So no police uniforms should not be banned. Anyhow most police uniforms do not cover the entire face leaving only the eyes visible.”
by fat tim, Coooooolville
Friday, July 23 2010, 3:10PM
“@ Mr Leicester...some valid points. However, imo crims are very unlikely to go to their local Asian tailor to get kitted out for the latest job they're about to go on. The recent case of Ian Tomlinson also shows that crimes can committed with impunity whilst wearing a police uniform....shall we ban them being worn in public, too?
@ Rich... I didn't mean to offend. I used the phrase you reproduced as, in my experience, the people who moan most often about the loss of the English culture are usually those who don't realise how important the embracing of other peoples is to our own culture and sense of national identity. We are, after all, a nation of immigrants.”
by Rich, Leicestershire
Friday, July 23 2010, 1:22PM
“"People droning on about our culture etc"
Well fat tim, this is what the article is all about - a different culture to ours. So how come when its another group, such as Muslims, they can have all the culture they want, yet when its a normal man in the street you class it as 'droning'? It has to work both ways dosent it? Or are we not allowed a culture?
"I totally agree with an earlier poster who said Muslims are rapidly becoming scapegoats"
Whilst this is not aimed at myself I would like just to comment that my veiws against the veil do not have agenda or malice. I am not anti-islam I am just a normal person who finds it bizzare and anti-social that people feel the need to hide their identities.
I notice that not many people have commented on the fact that a muslim country such as Turkey has itsself banned the veil.......... Says it all really.”