Watchdog rejects call for cash inquiry into Leicester East MP Keith Vaz

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Profile image for Leicester Mercury

Leicester Mercury

Parliament's standards watchdog has rejected a call to investigate Keith Vaz over claims "suspicious" sums of cash were paid into his bank accounts.

Parliamentary standards commissioner Sir John Lyon was asked to look into the Leicester East MP's financial affairs after an article last week in the Daily Telegraph.

  1.  Leicester East MP Keith Vaz

    Leicester East MP Keith Vaz

The story outlined details of a 12-year-old Scotland Yard probe into Mr Vaz's financial affairs.

It claimed detectives discovered £500,000 was apparently deposited into the Labour politician's accounts over a six-year period – in addition to his salary – between 1997 and 2001.

A LA CARTE MENU ALWAYS AVAILABLE :)

Terms: Entertainment SATURDAY NIGHT Live Belly Dancer

Contact: 0116 2169184

Valid until: Monday, May 27 2013

The Telegraph story suggested a police document revealed officers could not establish the source of the cash but the report said "the level of funds received... are of a suspicious nature".

Mr Vaz said the payments "were not suspicious in any way and related to a property sale".

Tory North West Leicestershire MP Andrew Bridgen wrote to the parliamentary standards commissioner, who is responsible for investigating complaints about MPs who have allegedly breached the members' code of conduct.

He asked Sir John Lyon to see whether Mr Vaz broke the rules by failing to declare outside interests.

Yesterday, the commissioner's office said it had considered Mr Bridgen's complaint but would be taking no further action regarding Mr Vaz, who had denied there was anything suspicious in the payments.

A spokeswoman for Sir John said: "He has taken the decision not to act on the complaint."

She said the decision was taken because of the amount of time that had passed since the conduct he was being asked to look at. She also said the previous commissioner had investigated former Europe minister Mr Vaz over his relationship with the Hinduja Brothers – billionaire Indian businessmen who were seeking British passports.

Following that probe in 2001 and 2002, Mr Vaz was given a month-long suspension from Parliament, for "serious breaches" of the MPs' code of conduct and contempt of the house.

Mr Vaz was yesterday unavailable for interview but his office issued a statement saying: "Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP received a copy of a letter today from the parliamentary standards commissioner Sir John Lyon to the Conservative MP for North West Leicestershire Andrew Bridgen stating that he would be rejecting Mr Bridgen's complaint against Mr Vaz which was based on an article in the Daily Telegraph."

Mr Vaz had denied having any outside interests. In a statement, issued last week, he said: "These matters relate to two Parliamentary inquiries which began in 1999 and concluded in 2003.

"My finances were discussed by every newspaper in the country for three years and were the subject of extensive examination.

"I have had no outside interests.

"The Telegraph claims the unnamed police officer states the payments into my account were suspicious.

"They were not suspicious. They relate to the sale of a family home in London, the purchase of a new family home and a drawdown of equity from my bank."

Mr Bridgen was unavailable for comment yesterday.

The Metropolitan Police declined to comment.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for DonHenson

    by DonHenson

    Friday, October 12 2012, 6:17AM

    “As this was investigated 12 years ago, and no fault found, one wonders why Bridgen brought it up in the first place...”

  • Profile image for garyb2011

    by garyb2011

    Thursday, October 11 2012, 6:21PM

    “Investigated by a committee dominated by Labour MP's

    mmmmmmmmmmmmmm”

  • Profile image for Bob491

    by Bob491

    Thursday, October 11 2012, 4:59PM

    “andymel you are ten years out of date. The matter was investigated many years ago and there was nothing hidden.

    As for creating confidence amongst his constituents, I could point out that he always wins by a large majority.

    Unlike the greedy Bridgen.”

  • Profile image for LikeItaLot

    by LikeItaLot

    Thursday, October 11 2012, 4:23PM

    “In this country guilt has to be proven, not innocence established. And this is through due process, which in this case has been done by the appropriate authorrity. The equivalent of the CPS saying no case to answer.”

  • Profile image for andymel

    by andymel

    Thursday, October 11 2012, 11:05AM

    “Apart from the obvious cynical sarcasm, it does make sense. He is an elected member of parliament who needs to be wholly transparent to the people who vote him in. Surely the uncovering of the expenses scandals highlight this to some degree in that it exposed the rampant ingrained deceit that was happening.
    Should Mr Vaz have nothing to hide then his insistence on this subject could only help his situation in creating confidence amongst his constituents.”

  • Profile image for LikeItaLot

    by LikeItaLot

    Thursday, October 11 2012, 9:36AM

    “That does not make sense. If an official body or person has made the judgement then that is their job. On that reasoning any sniff or accusation would be subject and ignore the proper authorities.”

  • Profile image for andymel

    by andymel

    Thursday, October 11 2012, 8:59AM

    “Surely, if Mr Vaz has nothing to hide then he should insist upon an open public enquiry in order to clear his name.....Over to you Mr Vaz, what have you got to lose.”

  • Profile image for VanguardPawn

    by VanguardPawn

    Wednesday, October 10 2012, 7:24PM

    “So how and why did he 'acquire' a property worth half a million?”

  • Profile image for PLYMFOX01

    by PLYMFOX01

    Wednesday, October 10 2012, 2:24PM

    “Why doesnt this surprtise me?”

  • Profile image for Truth_Vibes

    by Truth_Vibes

    Wednesday, October 10 2012, 2:11PM

    “Boring! Tell us something we dont know. Most MP's and Councillor's have some sort of "business" on the side. Vaz is just blatant where as others are very discreet. What can anyone do if the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner himself is not interested?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article