The Big Debate: Nine of the candidates in race to be Leicester mayor face the public
Candidates bidding to become the city's elected mayor faced 400 voters in the final major hustings of the campaign last night.
The Big Debate, hosted by De Montfort University and the Leicester Mercury, saw nine of the 11 mayoral hopefuls given their toughest grilling of the campaign so far, by members of the public.
-

The Big Debate at De Montfort University in Leicester
-

The candidates who attended The Big Debate. Pictured front are (l-r) Mu-Hamid Pathan, Gary Hunt and Geoff Forse. Back (l-r) are Rick Moore, Ross Grant, David Bowley, Lee Sowden and Sir Peter Soulsby. Mohinder Farma took part in the debate but did not arrive in time to be on this photograph.
The biggest curve ball came when they were asked who they would tell voters to choose as their second-preference candidate.
Tory Ross Grant and Liberal Democrat Gary Hunt said independent businessman Rick Moore, but Labour's Sir Peter Soulsby opted for 18-year-old independent Mu-Hamid Pathan – and fired back: "The fact that the coalition candidates both back Rick says an awful lot."
Mr Grant and Sir Peter also clashed over the latter's previous stint as council leader. Mr Grant said he found it "hard to take Peter seriously when he talks about listening to the people" after he "railroaded through the closure of six of our city schools" and created New College "that failed miserably".
But a furious Sir Peter hit back: "These were failing schools. It was a tough decision but I had the courage to take it and have never regretted it."
Other issues covered included overhauling the city's transport system, how to embrace different ethnic communities and whether the mayor would be accountable.
A night of high-level debate was peppered with occasional moments of humour. Flamboyant independent David Bowley got one of the biggest laughs when he was asked what was his biggest mistake.
He said: "My biggest mistake was voting for (former Labour Leicester West MP) Patricia Hewitt."
Last night’s debate began with candidates given a minute each to
introduce themselves to the audience and set out their vision for the
city.
Nine of the 11 candidates running for mayor turned up, with
independent Nima Patel and UKIP candidate Regine Anderson choosing not
to take part.
Set-piece questions put by Mercury readers were
followed by a free-for-all from audience members, who asked varied
questions to which candidates had just seconds to compose their response
and give the audience an answer.
A final chance to sum up saw front-runner Sir Peter Soulsby take aim at his independent rival Rick Moore.
The
independent businessman grew up in Leicester and was educated here, but
Sir Peter pointed out that he no longer lives in the city.
He said: “Rick’s tried to rubbish the three mainstream candidates tonight.
“However,
the distinction of the three mainstream candidates is that they
actually live in the city. Rick lives in a village on the outskirts of
Market Harborough.”
Afterwards, Mr Moore said: “I’m clearly shaking
things up in this race when a mainstream candidate chooses to take time
out of their final pitch to the electorate to take a shot at me.”
Conservative
Ross Grant promised a “dose of common sense” if he was elected mayor,
while Liberal Democrat Gary Hunt said that, if elected, he would make
the council more efficient and put trust back into local politics in the
city.
Voters will go to the polls on May 5 to have the final say on who runs the city until 2015.
The Mercury’s Dan Martin and political correspondent David MacLean watched the debate unfold.
QUESTION 1
What sort of relationship would you like to have with central government?
Leicester’s mayoral candidates all said they would stand up to the
government to represent the needs of the city, though some stressed the
importance or working with Westminster to get cash for public services
flowing into the city.
Conservative Ross Grant said he would not challenge the government for the sake of grabbing headlines.
He
said “We need to put forward rational arguments on why the government
should be doing more for Leicester and doing different things for
Leicester.
“One thing that will not work is to just play to an
audience, where you go out as if you are going head to head with the
government and fighting it all the time.
“It may look good in terms of headlines, but it is not going to achieve the things we need for the city.”
Liberal Democrat Gary Hunt
said the relationship had to be good because central government was
responsible for giving the city council 86 per cent of its cash.
He
said: “If we are ever going to get education and employment cured in
this city, we are going to want every pound out of the government that
they are capable of giving us.
“Now is the time to get me in charge
of Leicester, because we can get real money out of the government with
me in charge of the city.”
Independent Rick Moore said the reliance on government cash needed to be balanced with standing up for local priorities.
“This
is a two-way street. Funding is substantially from government, but that
two-way street also means we have to stand up for what we believe in.
“We
have to say to government: ‘These are our local issues and you, the
government, must understand us and respect them and we shall fight for
them and we shall fight very, very hard for them.”
Labour’s Sir Peter Soulsby said he would oppose the current cuts imposed by government on the city council.
He said: “The mayor’s relationship with central government needs to be robust.
“Central government is forcing councils to do their dirty work for them and make some very savage cuts to our public services.
“It also needs to be realistic, because the government is the government and we need to work with them.”
He
said that as chairman of Leicester’s City Challenge, he had worked with
Tory governments in the past to secure millions of pounds for the city
and promised he could do so again.
Independent candidate David Bowley
said he would like to “barricade Leicester up and fire arrows at
central government, while fellow independent Mu-Hamid Pathan earned
applause from the audience for saying his relationship with government
would be “transparent and clear.”
A third independent candidate Lee Sowden said one of the things he had learned was that “you always have to work with people you don’t like.”
QUESTION 2
What
thoughts have the candidates given to such things like community
relationships, community representation and community development?
Gary Hunt said he did not think the existing council was properly set up to deal with the changing ethnic make-up of the city.
“We must be capable of coping with that change,” he said.
“A
multi-cultural community, by its very nature, requires special
attention. That’s another reason why I want money and decision-making
powers out in the communities of the city.
“I just don’t think we are
capable any more of running a huge bureaucracy, with 16,800 people
employed, that can actually respond to the needs of the community. You
just can’t do it.
“It’s too big, too unwieldy. It costs too much.
“So you put it out into the community, you give those people power and you give those people the money to govern themselves.”
Leicester University student Lee Sowden said he wanted to build the campuses’ multi-culturalism in the wider city.
He said: “The university is a microcosm of the city. These are the ideas I want to bring into the city.
“Put
power back to the people of the city. People know what they want and
we want to get those people accountable and make it work for everyone.”
Sir Peter Soulsby told the audience that it was the diversity of the city that prompted him to stay here after he had been a student.
He
said: “I think we have a lot in this city to be proud of – the way in
which the city has been enormously enriched by people who have chose to
make their homes here and raise their families here – but we have
nothing to be complacent about.
“Community cohesion is always a work
in progress. It’s not something you have achieved. It’s something you
have to continue to strive for.”
He stressed it was important to listen to the needs of different communities and that was something he would do as mayor.
Rick Moore said he was concerned about the low number of high level black and Asian civil servants in the city council ranks.
He
said he hoped to change that adding: “I believe in targeting. I don’t
believe in positive discrimination, I think it’s demeaning and
patronising, but I think we still have loads of work to do with black
and Asian communities in saying ‘come on, get on board’.”
The panel
was asked what it would do to stop groups such as the English Defence
League and the British National Party exploiting the city.
Ross Grant said: “I think we have beaten the BNP in Leicester, but it is no reason just to be complacent.”
He
said it was important the city council did not do anything to cause
friction by handling different communities in different ways.
Peace and Unity candidate Mohinder Farma said he spend 48 years fighting racism and discrimination in the city and would continue to do so.
The Green Party’s Geoff Forse
said: “The city has a very good record in its working together. It’s a
job in progress and I don’t think its a job that can ever be finished.”
He said he would consult with all ethnic groups if elected.
OPEN TO THE FLOOR
DMU vice-chancellor Dominic Shellard opened up the floor to audience members to put quick fire questions to the candidates.
Who would candidates encourage voters to give their second preference votes to at the mayoral election?
Rick Moore said:
“I’d imagine that many people may put their first preference as Labour.
However, if you aren’t using your first preference vote for an
independent, then use your second vote for Rick Moore.”
Gary Hunt said he would also back Mr Moore.
But Sir Peter Soulsby said: “The fact that coalition candidates are both backing Rick says an awful lot. I back Mu-Hamid (Pathan), who is the voice of youth.”
How would you improve education in the city?
Sir Peter Soulsby said: “We’ve got some excellent education in
this city and we’ve got some that falls a long way short of what’s
acceptable. We have some good secondary schools, and some which are
frankly not anywhere near satisfactory.
“We need to make sure excellence is shared – a partnership approach where the best help the worst.”
Independent Mu-Hamid Pathan
said: “We can only improve schools by listening to the young people who
are learning there because, at the moment, when Ofsted comes to inspect
a school every few years it’s a hand-picked selection of students who
they get to speak to. I want to find a way to make sure that young
people can contact the mayor directly if they have concerns about their
school.”
How would you protect care homes and other facilities for vulnerable people?
Gary Hunt said: “Liberal Democrat councils across the country are protecting these services. It is Labour that is making the cuts.
“We
need to cut all unnecessary spending to protect services. We spend the
same on staff that we don’t know what they’re doing than we’re making in
cuts.”
Rick Moore said: “We need to take fripperies out of
the budget that we don’t need. There’s no need to spend cash on new (One
Leicester) banners to hang on lampposts.”
The mayor will have unprecedented powers. How do we make sure that they’ll remain accountable during their four-year term?
Sir Peter Soulsby said: “This is part of the reinvigoration
of local democracy. I can tell you now that if I’m elected mayor I’ll be
back in front of audiences such as this one, listening to what people
say.”
He added that his time in Parliament had shown him that
thorough scrutiny of decisions made by those in power was good for
democracy. “I want a similarly high standard of scrutiny in Leicester,”
he said.
Mu-Hamid Pathan said: “I’ll give people the power to get rid of me mid-term if they don’t like how I’m performing.”
See YouTube video clips from the Big Debate here







21 Comments
View all
by Avtar, Oadby
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 11:40PM
“No one man should have so much power. However, if one man must rule over a city, a directly elected mayor is better than an indirectly elected mayor which is, effectively, the current situation where the councillors of the ruling party choose the man, or woman, who will rule over us. At least citizens from outside of the LibLabCon party will stand a chance and maybe the extra competition will force our career politicians to pay greater heed to the will of the people.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 9:12PM
“& M of LE3,
Don't forget he said something silly about subliminal messaging....
It doesn't work anyway...
must vote labour....must vote labour.. must vote labour..... ;)”
by m, le3
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 7:13PM
“"What did Paul Brant say Censored??" - something along the lines that Soulsby and Labour were a bunch of racist fascists.”
by Simon P, Leicester
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 6:10PM
“I echo your sentiments Suecat2.”
by Anon, Leicester
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 6:07PM
“Soulsby, you did not 'teach' special needs, you used their time to do politics! What did Paul Brant say Censored??”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 4:51PM
“When Sir Peter becomes (oops, sorry, if he becomes) the elected Mayor, will he be allowed to employ his family (Wife - Office Manager, 2 x daughters - Junior Secretaries) as he did as an MP?
Yes many other MPs employ some family members.”
by Miss Whiplash, Town
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 4:03PM
“Soulsby what a plank, proves my previous comments about him, looking for one last gravy train pay out, and never ever cared about our City. his agenda is take the money and run. VOTE RICK MOORE.”
by Suecat2, Leicester
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 3:45PM
“I think he does live in the City off London Road so I hear.
I am not particularly a labout fan, nor aligned to any other party and not really enamoured by most of the candidates.
However I do think we need a good and effective leader as mayor as that is the only way to have proper accountability where the buck stops- whomever it turns out to be. At the moment we have a council of faceless officers who are not even visible let alone who listen.
To Kulgan, Crydee - I do switch off with continuous sniping- like I said - especially when it contains no substance. It's OK to criticise if backed up with sound evidence but that is a completely different thing to taking a swipe because someone belongs to a particular party.
Even though I don't have any particular poliical alliance I do recognise strengths in different individuals whichever party they come from.
Democracy is all very well but someone, somewhere still has to make a decision and it is impossible to please every single person in the City with many diverse views - not a job I would like!”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 3:26PM
“@Phil,
Suecat2 did say yesterday "Surely any advocate for the City needs to be resident in it!" so I don't think she will be voting for the Labour PPC.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Tuesday, April 19 2011, 2:25PM
“@Suecat2,
I was only going on your comment "once the sniping starts, count me out." After all you didn't say 'once the sniping starts, count me out unless they have been sniped at first'.
;)”