May blasts judges for deportation failures
Home Secretary Theresa May has accused judges of "subverting" British democracy and making the streets more dangerous by ignoring new rules aimed at deporting more foreign criminals.
In a scathing attack, she vowed to introduce primary legislation to restrict the human rights of offenders after a minority of the judiciary decided to "ignore Parliament's wishes".
But she warned the delay in getting that on to the statute book would inevitably mean "more victims of violent crimes committed by foreigners in this country". MPs approved new guidance for judges in July last year making clear the right to a family life – set out in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – was only qualified.
The change was designed to end a string of cases where it was used to justify granting foreign criminals the right to remain in the UK rather than being deported.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013
Labour questioned at the time whether the guidance would be sufficient to override the precedent set by earlier cases and said it would support primary legislation.
But writing in the Mail on Sunday, the Home Secretary pinned the blame squarely on the judges who have "got it into their heads that Article Eight... is an absolute, unqualified right".
She said: "Unfortunately, some judges evidently do not regard a debate in Parliament on new immigration rules, followed by the unanimous adoption of those rules, as evidence that Parliament actually wants to see those new rules implemented," she wrote.
One judge, she noted, had justified his decision on the basis that the new guidance had been subject only to "a weak form of parliamentary scrutiny".
"It is essential to democracy that the elected representatives of the people make the laws that govern this country – and not the judges," she wrote.
"Yet some judges seem to believe that they can ignore Parliament's wishes if they think that the procedures for parliamentary scrutiny have been 'weak'.
"That appears actually to mean they can ignore Parliament when they think it came to the wrong conclusion."
She said she was determined to bring forward a new law making it clear the deportation should be the norm in everything but "extraordinary circumstances".
"It is depressing the steps we have already taken should have been insufficient to produce that result. The inevitable delays inherent in passing primary legislation mean there will be many more foreign criminals who successfully avoid deportation on the basis they have a family here."
3 Comments
by LewisC109
Monday, February 18 2013, 9:25PM
“the judges only follow the law who makes the laws back to square one”
by llamalamb
Monday, February 18 2013, 5:35PM
“Yes.....but why is this in our local news. The Home Secretary made no mention of Leicester in connection with this matter as far as I am aware.
Reporting this without local context is irrelevant........unless the intention is to inflame local tension in an area with a high immigrant population.”
by 4_Stroke
Monday, February 18 2013, 10:02AM
“What is the disciplinary process for Judges? Time and time again we here of outrageous decisions taken by those who we rely on to keep criminals off the streets. How can they be held accountable to the public?”