How budget cuts differ between Leicester city and Leicestershire councils
Leicester City Council and Leicestershire County Council expect an identical cut in Government grants, but each has conjured up vastly different budgets.
With the General Election looming, how have these conclusions been reached and what part does politics have to play in all of this?
Both administrations are working on same assumption that their Government grants will be reduced by 2% in the next few years.
The city council plans to shave 7% off its budget and cut 4% of staff over the next three years, while the county council is cutting its budget by 20%, and losing 10% of its employees.
About 70% of the Tory-controlled county council's budget comes from council tax, whereas the Labour-run city receives a similar proportion of its funding from Government grants.
We spoke to an expert who said the secret in the differences may equally lie in each council's funding arrangements and the hue of each's political beliefs.
Professor Lawrence Pratchett, head of the public policy department at De Montfort University, said: "It is a General Election year and that's likely to have a bearing on their priorities. Both councils are assuming a Conservative Government will cut public spending much harder than a Labour one.
"There are two cynical explanations for why the budgets are different and one is that the Labour party doesn't want to make heavy cuts before an election.
"Another possible explanation is the Tories want to make it look like they are having to cut because of Labour's bad management of the economy. In reality it will probably be somewhere in-between – the county council will make fewer cuts and the city will make more.
"It's important to also point out that the county is more rural and so it has different priorities than the city. So here we see the city council is renewing its Christmas lights. This might seem trivial to a reader who doesn't want to see their day centre close, but in terms of the issues the council deals with, it is arguably a vital investment.
"The city aims to build a commercial centre to rival Nottingham and it also wants to invest in community cohesion."
Last week Leicestershire County Council revealed its budget plans of cutting £66m from its £325m budget over four years. It also plans to axe 650 full time positions out of 6,000, excluding education staff.
The city council wants to slice £19m from a £280m pot, removing up to 270 posts out of 7,000 (excluding school staff) over three years.
Coun Ross Willmott, leader of the city council, said: "When the economy is growing, councils are able to spend more money but a recession has an effect on this and tough choices have to be made."
Conservative opposition leader Coun Ross Grant believes the council is holding out on making more cuts until after the election. He said: "It is avoiding real action until after the election – if Ross Willmott really believed in low tax he would have not upped it by about 5% in the last few years."
In the next financial year council tax in the county will go up by 2.5%. It will be frozen for the next three years if David Cameron is voted into power. This is because the Tories have promised any council raising tax by less than 2.5% will be given a top-up by central Government.
If Labour win, the council tax will increase by 2.5% each year.
During the same period the city's council tax will rise by 1.9% next financial year, and then 2.9% each year after that until 2013.









4 Comments
by Ad Leonard, MKt Harboro
Friday, January 15 2010, 10:16AM
“How can you compare urban with rural? It's like comparing chalk and cheese. Labour Coty relies on govt grants to get what it wants. County relies on council tax and less govt grant because it delivers its services more efficiently. Willmott faces 2 elections- general election in 2010 and City in 2011. He's putting tax up by 8% over 3 years becasue he knows the income he rlies upon form govt grant will be cut., It isn't rocket science. Labour are also raiding the reserves to supplement their council tax increase this year and this will have to be repaid at some stage. If that "professor" calls himslef an expert I'd like to know what in- his political analysis is juvenile and basic beyond merit. Come on LM- you can do better than this!”
by Liam McCarthy, Leicester
Thursday, January 14 2010, 12:05PM
“The City has one set of councillors. The County has two, one at District level and one at County level. Getting rid of one set and have a unitary county would save more - and be radical.”
by Andrew, Loughborough
Thursday, January 14 2010, 11:23AM
“Davie - there will be service cuts as a result of the fewer staff. Libraries and museums will close potentially. This isnt a case of staff cuts with no impact on the level of public services. All thanks to those fat cat bankers who are now buying Lambos again with bonuses from the money we gave then to save their jobs 12 months ago when they brought the world to its knees!”
by Davie Gee, Glenfield
Thursday, January 14 2010, 11:15AM
“What I fail to understand is why these 'now' redundant posts were needed in the first place. It's not as if the councils have a variable customer level, their trade doesn't fluctuate like 'normal' businesses. It therefore strikes me that if the posts are unnecessary in a time of recession they were not needed at all and that Councils have been profligate and empire building with taxpayers money. Perhaps as well as cutting jobs they should resign due to their gross mismanagement of our taxes.”