All change as political map of Leicestershire is redrawn

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Profile image for Leicester Mercury

Leicester Mercury

The political map of Leicestershire is set to be redrawn in one of the biggest shake-ups for decades.

Half of the county's 10 constituencies are set to change following a review by the Boundary Commission, which aims to cut the number of MPs from 650 to 600 by 2015.

Under the plan, revealed today, Rutland and Melton, Loughborough, Harborough, Leicester South and Leicester East would not change, but the remaining constituency boundaries would all be altered.

North West Leicestershire constituency would be split into two.

Andrew Bridgen, the constituency's Tory MP, said: "The thought of having this constituency carved up is regrettable.

"Constituencies spread across county and district boundaries are likely to make casework a lot harder for MPs.

"However, I voted for a reduction in the number of MPs and I stand by that."

One half of the constituency, including Coalville, will join with Nottinghamshire's Rushcliffe to form a new constituency called Coalville and Keyworth.

If the change goes ahead, current Rushcliffe MP Ken Clarke could potentially challenge Mr Bridgen to stand as Tory candidate in the new constituency at the next election.

Lutterworth would be moved from South Leicestershire, represented by Andrew Robathan, to the Daventry constituency, in Northamptonshire.

The remainder of South Leicestershire would be renamed Blaby and contain all but three wards in the district of Blaby, as well as Earl Shilton.

Tory Mr Robathan said: "I support the reduction of MPs – if I had it my way I'd cut the number to 500.

"However, I'm disappointed at the plans to cut the Lutterworth area from my constituency, as that's where I live."

Leicester West, represented by Labour's Liz Kendall, would expand to incorporate the Millfield, Ravenhurst and Fosse and Winstanley wards of Blaby.

Ms Kendall said: "I cautiously welcome the changes, given the mandate of the Boundary Commission was to reduce the number of constituencies.

"However, I do feel that the number of Labour seats will be reduced as a result."

The Charnwood constituency, represented by Tory Stephen Dorrell, would be renamed Mid Leicestershire and have three wards from the Bosworth constituency added to it.

The remainder of Bosworth, whose MP is Tory David Tredinnick, would be extended north to include Ashby and the surrounding area.

Colin Copus, local government professor at De Montfort University, said the planned changes were significant.

"The size of the constituencies will be very similar, but it means that in many cases we're losing the link between constituencies and local authority areas.

"We've also got strange situations where an MP will be representing areas with very different identities because they're in different counties."

But he added: "I don't see any major political winners or losers in this."

MPs and other interested parties will be able to "appeal" against the commission's provisional findings as part of a 12-week consultation process.

After considering these arguments, the commission will then release a revised plan, which itself will be subject to extensive consultation.

The final plan must be submitted to Parliament by October 2013 to be in place for the next election, scheduled for May 2015.

See the Boundary Changes Consultation website here.

7
Tweet this article
Report

7 Comments

  • Profile image for TheFosseBoys

    by TheFosseBoys

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 5:16PM

    “Rutland is not part of Leicestershire period.”

  • Profile image for CGLee

    by CGLee

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 12:42PM

    “I shouldn't worry, Red_Ned, the House of Lords, in its present form, is in terminal decline anyway.”

  • Profile image for Red_Ned

    by Red_Ned

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 12:36PM

    “So by reducing the number of MPs (and increasing the number of unelected members of the House of Lords) we are going to get more democracy?”

  • Profile image for Semazasez

    by Semazasez

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 11:52AM

    “Melton and Rutland have synergies though, and dare I say, Rutland is kind of Leicestershire anyway.

    Coalville, however, sits firmly in the Northwest of the county and has no relationship with Nottinghamshire at all. In terms of voting numbers it probably won't be a problem but in terms of representing constituents it most certainly will. You can't have a local MP if half your constituency isn't local.”

  • Profile image for CGLee

    by CGLee

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 11:00AM

    “Semazasez, we already hace constituencies that cross county boundaries - Melton and Rutland, for example. I don't see that crossing boundaries will cause a problem. They should all be roughly the same size (as regards voters) and that is what will be achieved. Obviously there will be winners and losers, c'est la vie.”

  • Profile image for martin_le3

    by martin_le3

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 10:36AM

    “It does seem that this might replace one problem, that some constituencies represent more voters than others, with a different problem, that the new constituencies alienate a significant number of those that live in them. Still, it should cause some entertaining in-fighting in the political parties.”

  • Profile image for Semazasez

    by Semazasez

    Tuesday, September 13 2011, 10:20AM

    “What relationship does Coalville have with Keyworth and Rushcliffe?

    Absolutely none, they may as well stick Coalville with Aberdeen. I fail to see how any MP answering to a constituency that crosses county borders in such a way can represent voters effectively.

    It's nothing less than contempt for the electorate in these areas.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters