£5m cash granted to set up traveller sites in Leicestershire
Nearly £5 million of Government cash has been made available to provide new sites for travellers in Leicester and Leicestershire.
The money, for 56 pitches, is an attempt to reduce the number of unauthorised encampments.
-

The money, for 56 pitches, is an attempt to reduce the number of unauthorised encampments similar to this one that was set up temporarily in Leicester
Housing association Framework is to get £4.3 million to provide 50 pitches, while Leicester City Council successfully bid for £270,000 to provide six pitches.
Both organisations said they did not yet know where the sites would be.
Cheap Van Insurance(Commercial & Private Use) - Contact Insure365...
View detailsCheap Van Insurance(Commercial & Private Use) - Contact Insure365 01782 898188, Free Legal Expenses Cover Included at £25.00!
Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer
Contact: 01782 898188
Valid until: Monday, June 24 2013
If built, the pitches would more than double the number of publicly managed traveller pitches in the county.
There are currently 20 at Aston Firs, near Hinckley, 21 at Meynells Gorse, in Leicester, and one in Hemington.
The money was welcomed by travellers' representatives but they warned 56 pitches would not be enough to meet demand.
Framework chief executive Andrew Redfern said the association would look to develop five pitches in Harborough and 15 each in Leicester, Melton and north west Leicestershire.
He said: "Deciding where these sites go is always a sensitive issue.
"There are some potential areas but we didn't want to identify any before we knew we had the money because it could lead to concern about something that may not happen.
"People's views are often that travellers are okay but not in their back gardens.
"It is the case that if we can't find suitable sites, we might not get the money.
"I honestly do not know where the sites will be. That is something we will be looking at over the next few months before we sign the contract.
"That's when the planning process will begin.
"We will manage the sites and provide good-quality accommodation.
"This is not just a question of laying a strip of concrete for people to park a caravan on.
"There will be bricks and mortar where we build accommodation for members of the travelling community not moving around – the elderly or children going to a specific school.
"We will also have install proper sanitation, electricity, communal space and play areas as well as buy the land."
City mayor Sir Peter Soulsby said: "The figures bid for by the city council and Framework are based on the sorts of numbers needed to address unauthorised encampments and contribute towards meeting the need identified in the city.
"We are looking at how and where this money should be spent to best meet the needs both of residents and the travelling community.
"A full consultation process would be carried out on any potential travellers' sites identified as part of that work."
Tracy Nedic, chairman of Leicestershire Gypsy and Traveller Liaison Group, said: "This will help because 56 pitches is good for 56 families, but it is not enough.
"Based on the number of gypsy families in and around the areas, we need triple that.
"I have also heard this kind of thing before and nothing has happened.
"It is one thing to say that there will be new pitches and another entirely to put it into action.
"We would like the sites to be on the outskirts of towns and villages but not next door to tips and sewage works."




Comments
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 8:58PM
“Correct john, sorry Gwen : ) well done.”
by Gwen222
Sunday, January 08 2012, 8:55PM
“by Martin8
Sunday, January 8 2012, 6:47PM
"bimple the main reason they were asked to move as they took land which wasn;t theirs. What part of that do you not understand son?"
Sorry, but what bimple is saying is quite correct. All of the land is owned by the travellers. The evictions were from one section of the land because it didn't have planning permission. All of this information is freely available on various News sites including the BBC.”
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 8:34PM
“john Sythe known as bimple - troll? Well you wrote 17 times on this site yesterday is that a troll? Please explain?
Yes you are starting to get the idea they didn't have planning permission that is a good start you have searched very well, good chap.”
by bimple
Sunday, January 08 2012, 8:23PM
“Martin8, what on EARTH are you on about? The land was theirs, THEY OWNED IT!!!!! It isn't open to debate, its a fact! If you don't like my cutting and pasting web links (god only knows why?!) then google it!
And no, I don't own land. What has that got to do with the price of fish? I'm not a train driver but I know how to drive one, I'm not a land owner but I know the law and the facts about Dale Farm!”
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 8:21PM
“john Sythe known as bimple - you need to put a big J at the start, once you can spell your name we might listen to you?”
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 7:58PM
“......is the urban myth that many people believe.
No it is called the law bimple, look that one up a big word for you to search for. You either own land or not. Understand yet son?”
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 7:57PM
“bimple:
You still do not understand son? copy and pasting skills are not bad mind, can't say they mean much as you do not understand owning land or not. Do you own land bimple or don't you know or understand that son?”
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 6:47PM
“bimple the main reason they were asked to move as they took land which wasn;t theirs. What part of that do you not understand son?”
by stevebatkin
Sunday, January 08 2012, 6:20PM
“Labour Party / Tory Party past and present Governments have had decades to deal with problems concerning travellers and failed miserably!
http://tinyurl.com/c5fch56”
by Martin8
Sunday, January 08 2012, 5:38PM
“by bimple
Saturday, January 7 2012, 8:36PM
""I agree with SvenWeTrust, they at dale farm took land which wasn't theirs and we the tax payer have to pay why?"
Rachel, check your facts; they owned the land. It was theirs."
Hate to tell you this bimple but not al of it was their land, only some of it mate. Wrong again, shameful.”