Why religion shouldn't enjoy special favour
Allan Hayes reflects on his year as humanist chaplain to the Lord Mayor of Leicester
My year as Chaplain to the Lord Mayor has been an interesting and rewarding experience; meeting people from different communities has been a particular pleasure. The year started with some tension over the Civic Service in the cathedral. It proved impossible to agree on a way that I as a humanist could give a short address in what was a Christian service. As a consequence the Lord Mayor, the Lady Mayoress and I felt unable to attend the event.
The same problem could arise for any other non-Christian chaplain. This raises the obvious question: in a diverse city with people from a variety of religions and with many who do not belong to a religion, shouldn't a civic event be one in which we can all feel part and to which we can all contribute – a celebration of today's Leicester for all by all? I think so.
I have tried to encourage dialogue and improve understanding by my letters and other activities. I am grateful to the Mercury for carrying these and to individuals and organisations that have helped.
NEW LEBANESE HOME BUFFET EVERY DAY @ CEDARS LEBANESE REST £ 6.99...
Leicester's ONLY Lebanese Cuisine - Cedars Bar & Restaurant 46/48 Church Gate Leicester LE1 4AJ
View detailsA LA CARTE MENU ALWAYS AVAILABLE :)
Terms: Entertainment SATURDAY NIGHT Live Belly Dancer
Contact: 0116 2169184
Valid until: Monday, May 27 2013
During the year there have been repeated attempts to pin words like "aggressive", "extreme" and "militant" on secularists and atheists and accuse them of trying to exclude religion from the public space: this is a dangerous tactic, but fortunately, we have largely avoided it in Leicester.
Secularists recognise that religions are important to many and should contribute to the public debate, but insist that this must be done openly and through the normal democratic process: religions should not be embedded in the state structure or specially privileged. We are joined in this view by many within the religions who favour a secular state.
However, while pursuing dialogue and understanding, we should not overlook the facts that are being created on the ground.
The urgent issue now to my mind is whether our schools will help our children grow up together or will separate them by religion. The new free schools can be proposed by a local group or an outside body and be approved by the Secretary of State with very little local consultation. For a start, a Hindu free school, eventually to take 420 pupils, is opening in Evington in September next to St Paul's Roman Catholic school. I am told that other free faith schools are being proposed in the city. Change could come quickly and could damage both community schools and social cohesion. My experience as humanist representative on the Leicester Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education (SACRE) shows me that most families are very happy with how our community schools deal with religion. I would ask that if they hear of proposals for faith schools they get in touch with local head teachers and discuss the situation.
Allan Hayes, is director of the Leicester Secular Society.




Comments
by Kulgan, Crydee
Saturday, May 07 2011, 8:58PM
“@PB,
Perhaps she plays another tune ;)”
by PB, Leicester
Saturday, May 07 2011, 5:22PM
“I thought MS Chung was Director of the SS.”
by George Jelliss, Hastings (formerly Leicester)
Saturday, May 07 2011, 4:41PM
“As usual Allan Hayes is being far too polite. Secularists have every right to be forthright in their arguments against the prevalence of mediaeval superstition in this scientific age. Why should the churches still have such power over education of children? Why should government take heed of faith groups whose beliefs are based on wish-fulfilment instead of reality? It's time all this nonsense was recognised for what it is. Let's have more militancy!”
by Adrian, Leicester
Saturday, May 07 2011, 12:13PM
“Render unto Caeser the things of caeser, and render unto God the things of God... still stands today.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Saturday, May 07 2011, 7:43AM
“@Roy,
It is not personal prejudice as my second post makes clear. I have nothing against Allan Hayes beliefs.
My issue is with Humanist & Chaplain. They are the exact opposites. You cannot have a humanist chaplain.
If you want a comment on the crux of the letter then I will let you have one.
If parents want their children too attend faith schools then there is nothing wrong with that.”
by Gtee, Leic
Friday, May 06 2011, 10:03PM
“Though brought up in the Christian faith, I agree with Allan Hayes. My faith nor that of others, excuses or give rights to take liberties, behave in the way many do and then claim it is due to their faith. Selective schooling is a prime example and no faith should have the support or aid of the state to do this.”
by Roy Johnson, Leicester
Friday, May 06 2011, 7:49PM
“Shame you can't comment on the substance in the letter rather than personal prejudice.
It appears that Allan Hayes is speaking sense. Religous division does nothing for community harmony and religion has had it too good for too long with regard to priviledged status in the state structure. There needs to be a level playing field.”
by Adrian, Leicester
Friday, May 06 2011, 1:58PM
“When one find oneself in a hole... it is best to stop digging.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Friday, May 06 2011, 9:34AM
“Just to avoid any confusion, I am not saying Allan Hayes is dreadful. I am sure he is a genuinely nice guy.
It is the dreadful misnomer of Humanist Chaplain.”
by Kulgan, Crydee
Friday, May 06 2011, 9:32AM
“Thank God (pun intended) we no longer have that dreadful misnomer of Humanist Chaplain anymore.”