Two-year ban for Leicester snooker player Joe Jogia
Leicester snooker player Joe Jogia has been banned for two years after an investigation into suspicious betting patterns ahead of a Snooker Shoot-out match.
The World Professional Snooker and Billiards Association have said they are confident the ban demonstrates their serious stance on the threat of corruption.
-

Leicester snooker professional Joe Jogia
The world number 57 was banned until after the 2014 World Championship following an investigation into suspicious betting patterns relating to his scheduled Snooker Shoot-out match against Matthew Selt on January 28.
Jogia pulled out of the game citing injury, but at a hearing yesterday he was found to have breached section 2.1.4.1 of the WPBSA members’ rules regarding “conduct that is corrupt or fraudulent, or creates an actual or apparent conflict of interest, or otherwise risks impairing public confidence in the integrity and/or the honest and orderly conduct of the tour and/or any tournament or match.”
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
WPBSA chairman Jason Ferguson said after the verdict: “In protecting the public image of our sport, the WPBSA has strong links with the gambling commission and the betting industry.
“The integrity of our sport is of paramount importance and this outcome highlights how seriously the WPBSA will treat such matters.”
The 36-year-old had been provisionally suspended since May 30 and a WPBSA statement last night read: “It was alleged that a series of bets were placed on Matthew Selt to win the match and the pattern of betting was deemed to be suspicious.
“An investigation was conducted by the WPBSA which found that between 20th and 24th January 2012, a total of 19 bets were made or attempted, all at different betting shops in the Leicester area, on Matthew Selt winning this match. Fourteen bets to a total value of £4,830 were placed and four bets to a total of £2,300 and one bet of an unknown amount were declined.
“It was established that the two persons placing the bets were known to Joe Jogia as associates and telephone records demonstrate that in the period leading up to and following the placing of bets Joe Jogia was in repeated contact with them.
“There was no contact prior to 16th January 2012, then he sent 33 text messages and made three calls to one of the persons placing the bets and 42 text messages and one call to the other. Joe has failed to provide a consistent or detailed explanation as to the reason for the contact.
“Initially, Joe Jogia claimed that the reason for the betting must be that people were aware of an injury that he had suffered, but four of the suspicious bets were placed before he claimed to have suffered the injury and a further seven were placed before he sought medical attention.
“Although there was no evidence to show that Joe Jogia would have gained financially, the Disciplinary Committee found that the frequency and timing of this contact, his lack of a consistent explanation for the contact and the suspicions raised by the pattern of bets placed by his associates created an actual or apparent conflict of interest for him as a member of the WPBSA, or otherwise risked impairing public confidence in the integrity of his match with Matthew Selt.”
Jogia was also ordered to pay £2,000 towards the cost of the hearing and investigation.




Comments
by neiltheblue
Thursday, July 26 2012, 5:08PM
“They weren't "gangsters" they were journalists and the video footage of Higgins didn't exactly look like a man under duress.”
by Scottmason
Thursday, July 26 2012, 4:34PM
“I think its more to do with Higgins being able to fill an arena, this will all but finish Joe i would think, but if you play with fire.....”
by clagnutt
Thursday, July 26 2012, 3:44PM
“no comparison to higgins .higgins was approached by gangsters and no betting was done , this is what you call "bang to rights" ! and why is it a surprise !”
by vanip
Thursday, July 26 2012, 11:50AM
“harsh and no consistancy”
by Scottmason
Thursday, July 26 2012, 10:03AM
“Seems a bit harsh when you consider John Higgins only got a 6 month ban, and there was video evidence in the JH case???”